Re: [Full-disclosure] [Professional IT Security Reviewers - Exposed] SecReview ( F - )

2007-12-21 Thread Paul Melson
On Dec 20, 2007 7:19 PM, SecReview [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1.) What are your qualifications for reviewing these companies? We are a team of security professionals that have been performing a wide array of penetration tests, vulnerability assessments, web application security services etc.

[Full-disclosure] [Professional IT Security Reviewers - Exposed] SecReview ( F - )

2007-12-20 Thread Sec Review Sucks
This rating is based entirely off my personal feelings after reading several of the emails you've sent out to the Full Disclosure list. I bring up the following as my reasoning: 1.) What are your qualifications for reviewing these companies? 2.) Your criteria for review is clearly flawed.

Re: [Full-disclosure] [Professional IT Security Reviewers - Exposed] SecReview ( F - )

2007-12-20 Thread Mike Vasquez
What I really want to know, is if a past customer (err - reader?) of sec review surfaces with a negative opinion of them, will you adjust your grade accordingly? On Dec 20, 2007 1:20 PM, Sec Review Sucks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This rating is based entirely off my personal feelings after

Re: [Full-disclosure] [Professional IT Security Reviewers - Exposed] SecReview ( F - )

2007-12-20 Thread Kurt Dillard
Vasquez Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 8:17 PM To: Sec Review Sucks Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] [Professional IT Security Reviewers - Exposed] SecReview ( F - ) What I really want to know, is if a past customer (err - reader?) of sec review surfaces

Re: [Full-disclosure] [Professional IT Security Reviewers - Exposed] SecReview ( F - )

2007-12-20 Thread SecReview
1.) What are your qualifications for reviewing these companies? We are a team of security professionals that have been performing a wide array of penetration tests, vulnerability assessments, web application security services etc. One of our team members has founded two different security

Re: [Full-disclosure] [Professional IT Security Reviewers - Exposed] SecReview ( F - )

2007-12-20 Thread coderman
I've edited this document to remove ambiguous and self aggrandizing language. On Dec 20, 2007 4:19 PM, SecReview [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1.) What are your qualifications for reviewing these companies? We are a team of security professionals that have been performing a wide array of

Re: [Full-disclosure] [Professional IT Security Reviewers - Exposed] SecReview ( F - )

2007-12-20 Thread Sec Review Sucks
1.) What are your qualifications for reviewing these companies? We are a team of security professionals that have been performing a wide array of penetration tests, vulnerability assessments, web application security services etc. One of our team members has founded two different security

Re: [Full-disclosure] [Professional IT Security Reviewers - Exposed] SecReview ( F - )

2007-12-20 Thread Sec Review Sucks
Yes, coderman, they may save you the 2.7 minutes of surf time for pr0n by reviewing companies for you, but you are losing 30 minutes of pr0n time by reading their reviews. Sorry you feel my review of secreview sucks, but I strongly feel someone needs to speak up, as this is quite ridiculous. On