--- Joe Average <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I WOULD JUST LIKE TO EXPRESS MY DEEP SUPPORT FOR
> THIS IDEA. MAKING
> > THE LIST MODERATED WOULD REALLY HELP MY JOB AS A
> SECURITY
> > RESEARCHER. I COULD MAKE QUICKER, MORE WELL
> IN
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I WOULD JUST LIKE TO EXPRESS MY DEEP SUPPORT FOR
> THIS IDEA. MAKING
> THE LIST MODERATED WOULD REALLY HELP MY JOB AS A
> SECURITY
> RESEARCHER. I COULD MAKE QUICKER, MORE WELL
> INFORMED CHOICES IN MY
> DAY TO DAY TASKS OF PEN TESTING LEGITIMATELY. I
> WILL ON
--- Xyberpix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have to agree on this one that I don't think that
> moderation is the way to go.
> This is a damn good list, with a load of really
> intelligent people on it, who
> really contribute a lot to the entire community.
> Just because a few of us got outta ha
Seriously folks, just set some spam filters. Out of the 1640 FD messages
I had, I set a filter on 'n3t' and it snagged 225 messages, or in other
words, 13.7% of messages got junked. Total time: 1 minute
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charte
Enrico Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 12/15/2005 10:28:43 AM:
> forget it,
>
> we discussed this a few weeks ago, most of the guys on this list just
love
> to get spam and bullshit. The one side says "well yeah omg its
no
> full-disclosure anymore with moderation" (penguin fucker style)
an
On 12/14/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how many people who actually find value in this list (which i have,since len rose set it up quite a long time ago) agree with this
position?
I have found quite a bit of value in this list. Yes, there are a lot of crap posts on this list, but it has always b
Joe Average = n3td3v
So yeah. Your opinion is greatly valued here.
On 12/15/05, Joe Average <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/15/05, Bart Lansing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Mark, et al
> >
> > remotely possible that n3td3v or inf
You'd think guys could learn to ignore the trolls, but such is life.
Reply not to find out for whom the belle trolls, she trolls for thee.
-
Email solutions, MS Exchange alternatives and extrication,
security services, systems integration.
C
--On Thursday, December 15, 2005 19:28:43 +0100 Enrico Kern
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
forget it,
we discussed this a few weeks ago, most of the guys on this list just
love to get spam and bullshit. The one side says "well yeah omg its no
full-disclosure anymore with moderation" (penguin fucke
This list is supposed to be unmoderated
if u don't like this list then unsubscribe from it...and go to some moderated list...like...bugtraq
just my oponion
On 12/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I WOULD JUST LIKE TO EXPRESS MY DEEP SUPPORT FOR THIS IDEA. MAKINGTHE LIST
forget it,
we discussed this a few weeks ago, most of the guys on this list just love
to get spam and bullshit. The one side says "well yeah omg its no
full-disclosure anymore with moderation" (penguin fucker style) and the
others want the trash sorted out.
Well from my point of view a moder
On Thursday 15 December 2005 17:16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I WOULD JUST LIKE TO EXPRESS MY DEEP SUPPORT FOR THIS IDEA. MAKING
> THE LIST MODERATED WOULD REALLY HELP MY JOB AS A SECURITY
> RESEARCHER. I COULD MAKE QUICKER, MORE WELL INFORMED CHOICES IN MY
> DAY TO DAY TASKS OF PEN TESTING LEGIT
Joe
Average wrote:
>no
need,
>a) ban
all gmail addresses
>b) ban
nicknames (real name only)
>c) start
inforcing list policy for trouble makers who attack legitimate researchers like
netdev
Wow
1)
n3td3v & you meet both your A and B requirement.
2)
So..when are you leaving?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:39:41 +
Joe Average <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I WOULD JUST LIKE TO EXPRESS MY DEEP SUPPORT FOR THIS IDEA. MAKING
> > THE LIST MODERATED WOULD REALLY HELP
On Thursday 15 December 2005 07:20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> how many people who actually find value in this list (which i have,
> since len rose set it up quite a long time ago) agree with this
> position?
I cannot answer a number, but I can speak for myself:
I don't want a moderated list, b'ca
On 12/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I WOULD JUST LIKE TO EXPRESS MY DEEP SUPPORT FOR THIS IDEA. MAKINGTHE LIST MODERATED WOULD REALLY HELP MY JOB AS A SECURITY
RESEARCHER. I COULD MAKE QUICKER, MORE WELL INFORMED CHOICES IN MYDAY TO DAY TASKS OF PEN TESTING LEGITIMATELY. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:16:46 -0800
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I WOULD JUST LIKE TO EXPRESS MY DEEP SUPPORT FOR THIS IDEA. MAKING
> THE LIST MODERATED WOULD REALLY HELP MY JOB AS A SECURITY
> RESEARCHER. I COULD MAKE QUICKER, MORE WELL INFORMED C
On 12/15/05, Bart Lansing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1Mark, et alremotely possible that n3td3v or infosecBOFH (who seems to be
attempting to validate his choice of handles by being anunmitigated ass whenever possible) might actually have somethingconstruc
I WOULD JUST LIKE TO EXPRESS MY DEEP SUPPORT FOR THIS IDEA. MAKING
THE LIST MODERATED WOULD REALLY HELP MY JOB AS A SECURITY
RESEARCHER. I COULD MAKE QUICKER, MORE WELL INFORMED CHOICES IN MY
DAY TO DAY TASKS OF PEN TESTING LEGITIMATELY. I WILL ONLY GET THE
GOOD STUFF AND NONE OF THIS PISSIN
Wow, we have another n3td3v here. Editing your emails? Sorry, not
guilty. Replying to you on list so everyone can see you continue to
stir the pot, guilty.
My momma did not teach my any manners but I taught your momma that
thing she does with her tongue.
On 12/14/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark, et al
Given the noise ratio (esp. lately, thanks to a couple of
misanthropes with nothing vaild to say) I would agree that some
moderation of the list would be in order, if there was a way to
find a verifiably non-biased and tolerant inidivdual
ya but those half subscribers are kids who do nothing except pissing at
each other in the list. When the list was started there werent such
number of kids pissing in the list. But now time is changed and lots of
lamers are there. Its time that this list shud be moderated.On 12/15/05, InfoSecBOFH <[
Hey cry baby, the only reason this list exists and has half the
subscribers it has is because of the lack of moderation. If this list
was moderated it would be nothing more than Bugtraq
On 12/14/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it seems to me that without a moderator (since ther
it seems to me that without a moderator (since there is the apparent
absence of people who are moderate, or even civilized), this list will
continue its degeneration into a never-ending pissing contest.
(some people don't seem to think that the social compact one accepts
when joining a list applie
24 matches
Mail list logo
