yea he is watching - hes been emailing me direct to respond to my criticism.
welcome to my trash folder.
if nothing else this will make his pathetic existence on this list more
difficult. you never know he might actually get the point and fuck off for
good... but im not holding my breath on that o
Who cares anyway ?
2009/2/3 Ureleet
>
>
> i guarantee hes watching right now.
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Biz Marqee wrote:
> > n3td3v being moderated is fantastic.
> >
> > his banning is not a strike against the "spirit" of fd, its someone
> standing
> > up and saying "I have had en
i m willing to bet he is still on the list tho. who knows how many
aliases he has. no--i m not 1, even tho he accuses me of being 1.
i guarantee hes watching right now.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Biz Marqee wrote:
> n3td3v being moderated is fantastic.
>
> his banning is not a strike aga
n3td3v being moderated is fantastic.
his banning is not a strike against the "spirit" of fd, its someone standing
up and saying "I have had enough of this fruitcake".
full disclosure is great when its dropping 0day, discussing security in
general, coming off as a righteous plan9 ninja, insulting
On Sunday 01 February 2009 08:27:41 vulcanius wrote:
> Thank you.
I have five Full Disclosure filtering lists, three of which are affected by
John's decision. I went back and read this thread at one of the sites that
archives Full Disclosure, because some of the users trigger the filters if
the
Thank you.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
as much as I try and squint, your e-mail address still doesnt turn
into jo...@grok.org.uk
so maybe you should shut the fuck up and not play moderator when you
arent wanted nor needed.
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:41 PM, John C. A. Bambenek, GCIH, CISSP
wrote:
> Looks like someone else is volunteeri
Looks like someone else is volunteering to join Andrew is F-D purgatory
On 1/31/09, don bailey wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>> On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:38:06 MST, don bailey said:
>>
>>> of noise. If this is allowed, it only proves that
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:38:06 MST, don bailey said:
> of noise. If this is allowed, it only proves that free venues for
> security discussion (rational or not) can be manipulated with something
> as simple as inane chatter.
It's *long* been understood within the security community that the best wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:38:06 MST, don bailey said:
>
>> of noise. If this is allowed, it only proves that free venues for
>> security discussion (rational or not) can be manipulated with something
>> as simple as inane
Hello list,
I'm a longtime lurker of this list and have also been on the verge of
saying bye-bye to Full-Disclosure (I've got something better to do with
my life than constantly deciding if someone's alias(es) belongs in my
killfile or not).
In this case I am with the moderator as long as he
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
List,
If you allow n3td3v to change the tone of the Full Disclosure list
you're allowing the destruction of the FD spirit. It doesn't matter if
he babbles on about nothing for years or even months. The fact remains
that his efforts may be to destroy t
Create a blacklist for blacklists, then use Guninski's solution. Simple :)
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Bipin Gautam wrote:
> On 1/31/09, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>> 2. you fail to realize that blacklisting is not a solution - ask the
>> antivirus sellers. it is much cpu-wise to filter the *kn
On 1/31/09, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> 2. you fail to realize that blacklisting is not a solution - ask the
> antivirus sellers. it is much cpu-wise to filter the *known* few
> accounts of n3td3v instead of reading every email saying "*X* sux much"
> sent from a pseudo dummy email created at the cos
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 02:32:05PM +, John Cartwright wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have recently begun some 'spring cleaning' of the Full-Disclosure list.
>
0. i would like this list to be unmoderated (not sold like \aleph_1's
one)
1. ads like hosted and sponsored by $lamers is not a good idea
2. you fa
Hi
I have recently begun some 'spring cleaning' of the Full-Disclosure list.
Those individuals who have proven themselves incapable of behaving in
an open environment are no longer welcome, and I am in the process
of removing the accounts of those concerned.
Primarily, Mr Wallace will no longer
16 matches
Mail list logo
