Aaron Gray wrote:
Get killlisted for complaining about racist ranting :(
Nope, you got kill-listed because you're calling for moderation of an
unmoderated mailing list that is known specifically for being
unmoderated. No offense, but that pretty much invalidates the
probability that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Heres a call for moderation before it gets too late.
I've lost my chart, can anyone remind me how many drinks that rates on
the Full-Disclosure drinking game? Something like two, plus one for
every ten replies?
I get sick after one shot of
You are now permanently moderated off all lists. Welcome to the kill
file where you join the ranks of n3td3v and company. For a moderated
version of this list and many others you could check the countless
archives for the this specific topic or just visit -
I see your email address is on a block list.
- Original Message -
From: Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Aaron Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Full Disclosure full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2006 2:55 PM
Subject: **SPAM** Re: [Full-disclosure] Call for moderation
You
You are now permanently moderated off all lists. Welcome to the kill
file where you join the ranks of n3td3v and company. For a moderated
version of this list and many others you could check the countless
archives for the this specific topic or just visit -
Get killlisted for complaining about
On Sat, 20 May 2006 01:24:27 BST, Andrew Smith said:
There are a lot of moderated lists.
This isn't moderated.
That is the point of this list.
Don't be an idiot, just because there are a few idiots about doesn't mean
that you should call for a fd-bugtraq change.
OK everybody... Andrew
Regarding some previous
threads.
Some people just show how low they are
!
This is why we need some form of "Code of Conduct" or even
better change to a moderated list.
Otherwise the whole list just gets ruined and will ndeteriate
over time.
Heres a call for moderation before it gets too
If for some reason this guy gets taken seriously and his request
actually gets considered. I would like to say I wouldn't like a
moderated list.. If I did I'd be looking at bugtraq right now.On 5/19/06, Aaron Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding some previous
threads.
Some people just
moderation for utter crap != bugtraq
On 5/19/06, evilrabbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If for some reason this guy gets taken seriously and his request actually
gets considered. I would like to say I wouldn't like a moderated list.. If I
did I'd be looking at bugtraq right now.
On 5/19/06,
Go Fuck Yourself!
Moderation = Censorship
On 5/19/06, Aaron Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding some previous threads.
Some people just show how low they are !
This is why we need some form of Code of Conduct or even better change to
a moderated list.
Otherwise the whole list just
bugtraq != reasonably full disclosure either.
On Fri, 19 May 2006, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:26:12 -0400
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Full Disclosure full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure
Agreed. The whole point of Full-Disclosure is to be unmoderated, and
it would contribute nothing to the security community if it were
moderated, because good moderates lists, like Bugtraq, already exist.
Those who want an unmoderated list instead of Full Disclosure are free
to leave. Even better,
14:26:12 -0400
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Full Disclosure full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Call for moderation
moderation for utter crap != bugtraq
On 5/19/06, evilrabbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If for some
Your email client has a moderation button -- it says Delete and sometimes
has a red x or a garbage can icon. Make use of that and don't worry about
moderating the list.
?php
/*
Stephen Johnson c | eh
The Lone Coder
http://www.ouradoptionblog.com
Join our journey of adoption
disclosure either.
On Fri, 19 May 2006, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:26:12 -0400
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Full Disclosure full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Call for moderation
moderation
I second to the comment posted below. One of the reasons I joined
Full-disclosure was for its raw unmoderated data.
On the other hand, If we begin censoring off-topic messages we might as well
start banning people by their IP --- MAC Address :p. I would consider [EMAIL
PROTECTED] to be the
Right, so the machinery is already in place to partially moderate the
list in **special circumstances**. It is interesting that flaming and
rudeness are not given as examples of such circumstances, since flame
wars are very common on lists in general and on Full Disclosure in
particular, and
Things have been close to perfect since I started
auto-deleting messages containing 'n3td3v' back in
March.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
evilrabbi wrote:
If for some reason this guy gets taken seriously and his request actually
gets considered. I would like to say I wouldn't like a moderated list..
If I
did I'd be looking at bugtraq right now.
It will never happen. He's about the 10,987,365th person to ask for
moderation,
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
I hope it was clear that I was suggesting that filtering utter crap
would not turn the list into bugtraq.
One man's utter crap is another man's evening meal.
Learn to use filters.
--
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The
this list. It's not moderated -- don't like
it, unsubscribe.
- Original Message -
From:
Aaron Gray
To: Full Disclosure
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 2:16 PM
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Call for
moderation
Regarding some previous
threads.
Some people just show
On Fri, 19 May 2006 14:48:59 PDT, Daniel Veditz said:
Aaron Gray wrote:
Heres a call for moderation before it gets too late.
I've lost my chart, can anyone remind me how many drinks that rates on
the Full-Disclosure drinking game? Something like two, plus one for
every ten replies?
At
There are a lot of moderated lists.This isn't moderated.That is the point of this list.Don't be an idiot, just because there are a few idiots about doesn't mean that you should call for a fd-bugtraq change.
On 5/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:On Fri, 19 May 2006 14:48:59 PDT,
On 5/19/06, Andrew Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a lot of moderated lists.
This isn't moderated.
That is the point of this list.
Don't be an idiot, just because there are a few idiots about doesn't mean
that you should call for a fd-bugtraq change.
On 5/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
24 matches
Mail list logo
