What's your point numbnuts? Its also registered with marc.info. Should
I be afraid of a couple of linux geeks with squinty eyes and bad
breath kicking down my door? (Or at least knocking politely)
In case you're two stupid or paranoid to figure that one out ; no, no
I shouldn't. Because like MI6 t
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:13 PM, G. D. Fuego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why should ANYONE want to take part in your vulnerability notification day if
> you
> believe that the UK Security Service should be tracking these people.
> Considering you claim to be so close to them, wouldn't that just b
n3td3v, sounds like ur trying to suck ur own dick again. can you do that?
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 9:54 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 8:27 PM, G D Fuego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Apr 27, 2008, at 3:11 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 9:54 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Read ms02-039
> >
> > The patch was available 6 months before slammer, thanks to David.
> >
> > Its not his fault that people didn't apply the patch
>
> David has to take some responsibility for what happened, he can't put
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 8:27 PM, G D Fuego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Apr 27, 2008, at 3:11 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:13 PM, G. D. Fuego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:48 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Apr 27, 2008, at 3:11 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:13 PM, G. D. Fuego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:48 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> David, your research was responsible for the SQL Slammer Worm... but
>>> th
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:13 PM, G. D. Fuego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:48 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > David, your research was responsible for the SQL Slammer Worm... but
> > that makes you elite doesn't it, not a black hat.
> >
> > No wonder the UK secur
I think McDonald's is perfect for you. Would you like fries and a clue
with that?
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Joey Mengele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Techie,
>
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 00:39:48 -0400 Micheal Cottingham
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Indeed. There is no such thing as secur
G. D. Fuego schrieb:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Joey Mengele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> wishi,
>>
>> On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:19:46 -0400 wishi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I thought exactly the same. Security is a process. If someone
>>> doesn't
>>> understand, that it's be
Techie,
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 00:39:48 -0400 Micheal Cottingham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Indeed. There is no such thing as secure. Security is a process,
>one
>that never ends. If it did, many of us would be out of a job. ;)
>
Doesn't Geek Squad do more than security? I think your job is safe
at least you wouldn't have to remove trojans and "tracking cookies" off your
customer's machines then
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Micheal Cottingham <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indeed. There is no such thing as secure. Security is a process, one
> that never ends. If it did, many of us wo
Indeed. There is no such thing as secure. Security is a process, one
that never ends. If it did, many of us would be out of a job. ;)
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 12:01 AM, G. D. Fuego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Joey Mengele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > wis
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Joey Mengele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> wishi,
>
> On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:19:46 -0400 wishi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >I thought exactly the same. Security is a process. If someone
> >doesn't
> >understand, that it's better to know the vulnerabilities
wishi,
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:19:46 -0400 wishi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>I thought exactly the same. Security is a process. If someone
>doesn't
>understand, that it's better to know the vulnerabilities to
>defend, he
>didn't understand it.
>
I think you have this mixed up. Security a des
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
LoL
i think you mail client is fucked up!
cheers
Ferdinand
Am 26.04.2008 um 18:01 schrieb wishi:
> n3td3v schrieb:
>
>> David, your research was responsible for the SQL Slammer Worm... but
>> that makes you elite doesn't it, not a black hat.
>>
>>
n3td3v schrieb:
> David, your research was responsible for the SQL Slammer Worm... but
> that makes you elite doesn't it, not a black hat.
>
> No wonder the UK security service is interested in you, but I wouldn't
> call it an achievement, that calls you irresponsible in my view.
Never read such
n3td3v schrieb:
> David, your research was responsible for the SQL Slammer Worm... but
> that makes you elite doesn't it, not a black hat.
>
> No wonder the UK security service is interested in you, but I wouldn't
> call it an achievement, that calls you irresponsible in my view.
Never read such
G. D. Fuego schrieb:
>
> In fact, if Security Researchers are to blame for any bad uses of the
> vulnerabilities they discovered then what are you doing here?
AND:
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-
G. D. Fuego schrieb:
>
> In fact, if Security Researchers are to blame for any bad uses of the
> vulnerabilities they discovered then what are you doing here?
AND:
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:48 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David, your research was responsible for the SQL Slammer Worm... but
> that makes you elite doesn't it, not a black hat.
>
> No wonder the UK security service is interested in you, but I wouldn't
> call it an achievement, that
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 3:04 AM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:15 AM, jf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > you know theres surely someone more deserving in this industry of getting
> > screwed with than hdm; and thats not so much a vote for him but rather
> > a vo
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:15 AM, jf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you know theres surely someone more deserving in this industry of getting
> screwed with than hdm; and thats not so much a vote for him but rather
> a vote against others.
Ok, give it to David Litchfield instead, who purposely boy
;
> To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: H D Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Full-disclosure] Could n3td3v win a Pwnie award?
>
> Could n3td3v win a Pwnie award for innovation if Web Application
> Security Awareness Day is a success?
&
Could n3td3v win a Pwnie award for innovation if Web Application
Security Awareness Day is a success?
http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2008-April/061507.html
"Pwnie for Most Innovative Research
Awarded to the person who published the most interesting and
innovative research in
24 matches
Mail list logo
