Re: [Full-disclosure] Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up?

2007-06-19 Thread scott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At this point I believe gobblez,or whoever,is just a nuisance to ignore! When,or if,they have something worthwhile to say,maybe everyone else will pay attention.Until then ...:P Dr. Neal Krawetz PhD wrote: If you believe my method(s) was

Re: [Full-disclosure] Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up?

2007-06-19 Thread jt5944-27a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 gobbles - the only thing lamer than you are people who thinks krawetz-org is actually neal krawetz. I used a repeatable scientific proof that conclusively proves my findings. People constantly criticize me, claiming that I am wrong. However not

Re: [Full-disclosure] Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up?

2007-06-19 Thread jt5944-27a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 the real neal krawetz is mad that i posted those ip addresses from his logs. he says he wanted to monitor them. nobody read my last posting okay? lol -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Note: This signature can be verified at

Re: [Full-disclosure] Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up?

2007-06-18 Thread coderman
On 6/18/07, HACK THE GOV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: n3td3v is NOT Gobbles Gobbles is NOT n3td3v a biased mind peers into the chasm that is full-disclosure: Dr._Neal_Krawetz,_PhD. my god, it's full of [n3td3v | GOBBLES] !!! ... your paper was interesting and inherently flawed; may you one day

Re: [Full-disclosure] Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up?

2007-06-18 Thread Dr. Neal Krawetz PhD
If you believe my method(s) was flawed, then demonstrate your claim(s). I used a repeatable scientific proof that conclusively proves my findings. People constantly criticize me, claiming that I am wrong. However not one of these people are able to offer a valid scientific argument against me or

Re: [Full-disclosure] Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up?

2007-06-18 Thread Michael Silk
lol On 6/19/07, Dr. Neal Krawetz PhD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you believe my method(s) was flawed, then demonstrate your claim(s). I used a repeatable scientific proof that conclusively proves my findings. People constantly criticize me, claiming that I am wrong. However not one of these

Re: [Full-disclosure] Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up?

2007-06-18 Thread StaticRez
This is riduculous... On 6/18/07, Michael Silk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: lol On 6/19/07, Dr. Neal Krawetz PhD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you believe my method(s) was flawed, then demonstrate your claim(s). I used a repeatable scientific proof that conclusively proves my

Re: [Full-disclosure] Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up?

2007-06-18 Thread Sam
Carole Chaski gave you a run for your money tho. http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/11419/34147/threaded#34147 Dr. Neal Krawetz PhD wrote: If you believe my method(s) was flawed, then demonstrate your claim(s). I used a repeatable scientific proof that conclusively proves my