I think it is misleading to just blame it on title shortening when you
clearly stated in the body of the advisory:
"This 0day exploit for Backtrack 5 R2 was discovered by a student in
theInfoSec Institute Ethical Hacking class, during an evening CTF exercise."
This was also said on the original p
in soviet russia, lesson teaches you. in west, no lesson learnt by anyone.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Adam Behnke wrote:
> Yesterday I made a post concerning a 0day advisory in Backtrack 5 R2:
> http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2012/Apr/123
>
> The posting was incorrect, the vulnerability
Yesterday I made a post concerning a 0day advisory in Backtrack 5 R2:
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2012/Apr/123
The posting was incorrect, the vulnerability was NOT in Backtrack but in
wicd, no Backtrack contributed code is vulnerable. When we tweeted and
emailed to mailing lists the notific
