[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I take it that law enforcement computer examiners and prosecutors *do* have
the years of experience in software engineering and exploit construction and
use, to qualify them to translate a bit of data into forensic evidence of guilt?
Catch 22. This is why
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of J.
Oquendo
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 8:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Full Disclosure; Jason Coombs
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fw: [IACIS-L] Statement by Defense Expert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I take
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Jason Coombs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 04:13:33
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IACIS-L] Statement by Defense Expert
Dave_on_the_run [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 04:36:08 -, =?utf-8?B?SmFzb24gQ29vbWJz?= said:
Until and unless a person has worked for years as a software engineer, and
has studied technical details of information security including the creation
and exploitation of software bugs to force software to do things that it
