On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Shawn Nunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The hits just keep coming...
>
> Quoting n3td3v:
>
>
> "Back in the day when I had relations with him I was a humble script
> kid who didn't realise the full extent of what was going on, a little
> like when you're a kid y
The hits just keep coming...
Quoting n3td3v:
"Back in the day when I had relations with him I was a humble script
kid who didn't realise the full extent of what was going on, a little
like when you're a kid you might not realise your uncle is touching
you up because you don't realise what's going
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 5:37 PM, mark seiden-via mac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in my opinion a few of the "facts" in this posting may actually be true
Do share them with the list, Mr.Seiden... can you confirm to the list
there are spies in Yahoo?
> btw, n3td3v, I know Gadi Evron, and you're no
in my opinion a few of the "facts" in this posting may actually be
true (the ones with a possible harmless interpretation), but most are
colored
by a deeply distorted view of reality. also, a seeming inability to
closely read, critically think, or analyze risk rationally.
participating in p
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:44 PM, G. D. Fuego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
>
> And here you seem to be stating that the bad guys already work at Yahoo,
> which would make the photos piece irrelevant.
>
>
thank you for saying that. i was going to say it because i noticed that he
was contradicti
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 6:23 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:44 PM, G. D. Fuego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Removing your private mailing list that none of us can actually post to.
>
> You could subscribe then you wouldn't hit the bouncer server? Its a
> publi
Man, and I thought your tin-foil hat conspiracy bullsh*t was bad enough
before.
Do you, as a PERSONAL MATTER, oppose to Google Street View too, because
showing who parked where is a matter of national security or some other such
bullsh*t?
On a more serious note, PLEASE take your personal opinions
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:44 PM, G. D. Fuego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Removing your private mailing list that none of us can actually post to.
You could subscribe then you wouldn't hit the bouncer server? Its a
public mailing list as long as you register your google account to the
group.
>
>
n3td3v wrote:
>
> I could go further indepth but I don't think it would be appropriate
> without having to name names in public.
>
> n3td3v
>
You are an idiot. So tired of your crap showing up in my box. Say
hello to yet another kill file.
--Blaine
_
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:17:31 BST, n3td3v said:
> Ok, my comment above was slightly a drop in the sky to get attention
> of the problem, but look let's concentrate more on something else,
> which you seem to have purposely bypassed and snipped out, even though
> it was one of the key points...
I t
Removing your private mailing list that none of us can actually post to.
> I have to contest, at Yahoo--- Mark Seiden and others said Sunnyvale
> isn't MI5/MI6 and that people shouldn't be stopped on premises without
> permission for taking photos.
>
> And I was angry that Mark Seiden and others a
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:22 PM, G. D. Fuego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:17 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Ok, my comment above was slightly a drop in the sky to get attention
> > of the problem, but look let's concentrate more on something e
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:08 PM, G. D. Fuego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:05 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Kurt Dillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > - Bad guys would never think to, you know, go to the campus and
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:17 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok, my comment above was slightly a drop in the sky to get attention
> of the problem, but look let's concentrate more on something else,
> which you seem to have purposely bypassed and snipped out, even though
> it was one of
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:05 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:04:37 BST, n3td3v said:
>
> > There are many ways the parking setup could be used against Yahoo
> > adversaries, think car bomb, or truck bomb? It was hugely
> > irresponsible of Yahoo to allow such photos to be t
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:05 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Kurt Dillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - Bad guys would never think to, you know, go to the campus and look
> around?
>
> You forget, the intelligence services are indepth with Yahoo already,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Kurt Dillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Bad guys would never think to, you know, go to the campus and look around?
You forget, the intelligence services are indepth with Yahoo already,
and some of their senior software engineers are in the service.
I have spok
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:04:37 BST, n3td3v said:
> There are many ways the parking setup could be used against Yahoo
> adversaries, think car bomb, or truck bomb? It was hugely
> irresponsible of Yahoo to allow such photos to be taken by on-the-fly
> employees.
For the wannabe bomber, the fact that
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:04 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are many ways the parking setup could be used against Yahoo
> adversaries, think car bomb, or truck bomb? It was hugely
> irresponsible of Yahoo to allow such photos to be taken by on-the-fly
> employees.
>
The biggest p
n3td3v,
Are you Bin Laden? You're doing his job for him! If we can't even park
without being afraid someone is going to blow up our building, wtf?
Pictures of the parking lot? Big fucking deal!
Nate
On 4/14/08, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 6:54 PM, G. D. Fueg
5 PM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk; n3td3v
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: n3td3v has a fan
I have to contest, at Yahoo--- Mark Seiden and others said Sunnyvale
isn't MI5/MI6 and that people shouldn't be stopped on premises without
permission for taking photos.
And I was angr
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 6:54 PM, G. D. Fuego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:56 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Security Threater: reader comment from n3td3v
> >
> > Posted on: April 10, 2008, 9:17 AM PDT
> > Story: Bruce Schneier's new view on Security Theat
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:56:20 BST, n3td3v said:
> Security threater is good because it scares potential terrorists from
> being caught. It keeps the terrorists on their toes and worrying all
> the time.
No, it wastes lots of resources and keeps us from deploying security that
actually works. Ther
ngful but less visible security measures.
Bottom line: security theater isn't universally "bad." But it is
incontrovertibly insufficient.
- G
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "G. D. Fuego" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:54:29 EDT, "G. D. Fuego" said:
> Do you understand the point of terrorism? The end goal is not to kill
> people. There are plenty of more effective methods to kill people than
> they've been using. No, the end goal is to cause TERROR. They want us to
> be afraid to live
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:56 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Security Threater: reader comment from n3td3v
>
> Posted on: April 10, 2008, 9:17 AM PDT
> Story: Bruce Schneier's new view on Security Theater
>
> Security threater is good because it scares potential terrorists from
> being
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 5:06 PM, imipak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Schneier coined the phrase, dolt.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_theatre
Forwarded conversation
Subject: Security Threater: reader comment from n3td3v
From: n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Th
>> Hate to burst your bubble, but insider threats have been understood as an
>> issue since well before you were born.
>
>
> So has the concept of security threater, but that doesn't stop Bruce
> Schneier talking about it in essays
>
> http://www.schneier.com/essay-155.html and at security
> http
you don't see Bruce posting 5 times a day here
n3td3v wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:27 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:53:44 BST, n3td3v said:
>>
>> > It highlights what i've been saying for _years_ about never trusting
>> > your employees, and you've got to
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:27 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:53:44 BST, n3td3v said:
>
> > It highlights what i've been saying for _years_ about never trusting
> > your employees, and you've got to patch your offline machines as fast
> > as your online ones.
>
> Hate to
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:53:44 BST, n3td3v said:
> It highlights what i've been saying for _years_ about never trusting
> your employees, and you've got to patch your offline machines as fast
> as your online ones.
Hate to burst your bubble, but insider threats have been understood as an
issue sinc
On Apr 9, 2008, at 2:53 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> where do you come into the equation?
>
> It highlights what i've been saying for _years_ about never trusting
> your employees, and you've got to patch your offli
see:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:53 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > where do you come into the equation?
>
> It highlights what i've been saying for _years_ about never trusting
> your employees, and you've got to patch
Ever heard of insider threat? Hate to burst your bubble here, but
people have known about that for years. There's a reason why it is
called insider trading. ;)
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:53 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> where do you come into the equation?
It highlights what i've been saying for _years_ about never trusting
your employees, and you've got to patch your offline machines as fast
as your online ones.
Read the n3td3v advisory I just
now, i read sans as much as the next guy, as good or bad as that might be.
but the isc published this two days ago, where do you come into the
equation? and excuse me if i am ignorant of you reporting it to the isc if
you did.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:05 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> From: DUDE DUDERINO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I would love to see CNet News publish
> your wrods, but I don't think that will happen.
You know what's funny, look what just appeared in the last 30 minutes
on Cnet News after I post that stuff:
Hewlett-Packard has released a batch of USB keys for nume
I really need to learn how to reply for the list and not just the person
posting, sorry for the duplicate, bud.
-- Forwarded message --
From: DUDE DUDERINO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] n3td3v has a fan
To: n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTE
38 matches
Mail list logo
