On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:26:57 BST, n3td3v said:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:31 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oh, it *will* help. Just not help with bringing crime down.
>
> This in reality is nothing to do with crime, but to assist
> http://intelligence.gov.uk to do their job.
As I said - i
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:31 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:17:38 PDT, James Matthews said:
>
>> I think the irony of the situation is that they have their CCTV cameras for
>> years now and they didn't bring crime down. How will this database help?
>
> Oh, it *will* help.
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:17:38 PDT, James Matthews said:
> I think the irony of the situation is that they have their CCTV cameras for
> years now and they didn't bring crime down. How will this database help?
Oh, it *will* help. Just not help with bringing crime down.
pgpI5vJcRltnC.pgp
Descripti
I think the irony of the situation is that they have their CCTV cameras for
years now and they didn't bring crime down. How will this database help?
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 8:35 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 Oct, 11:56, "Robin Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Looks like the UK
On 10 Oct, 11:56, "Robin Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like the UK government is going to start monitoring us a lot
> closer in the
> future:http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/07/detica_interception_modernisation/
they are already doing it, you just don't know about it yet, oh you do
