Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

For the record, I got it because I got tired of HR guys asking me about security certifications just before deciding not to give me an interview. It's like a college degree... it's a piece of paper that is your entrance ticket. On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Daniel Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --On May 19, 2008 3:50:37 PM -0400 Elazar Broad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Yea, and there are plenty that can't even set up their own home > > network... > > > > If that's true, I'm sure you can name a few. > > Or

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

--On May 19, 2008 3:50:37 PM -0400 Elazar Broad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yea, and there are plenty that can't even set up their own home > network... > If that's true, I'm sure you can name a few. Or are you all hot air like two thirds of the bozos that constantly post to this list? Paul

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

read three times to understand. > > > >- Original Message >From: wilder_jeff Wilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Morning Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; n3td3v ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk >Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 8:58:26 AM >Subj

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

lists.grok.org.uk Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 8:58:26 AM Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks The CISSP is a management certification... not a techie cert... I dont need to hack to keep one out.. -Jeff -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GIT/CM/CS/O d- s:+ a C+++ UH++ P L++ E- w-

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

GEEK CODE BLOCK--> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk> Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 09:11:37 -0700> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks> > >> Anybody who thinks a CISSP is a "license to hack" is dreadfully ignorant>

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

On Fri, 16 May 2008 12:53:12 EDT, "Garrett M. Groff" said: > I think Valdis's point was valid. Why the sarcastic comments? (And what's > with the mustache wax comment?) Especially considering that my mustache is big and bushy and *not* the sort that needs mustache wax. Oh, and since I probably st

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

: Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 12:39 PM Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks > thank you for the qualified opinion valdis. everyone cares very much. > can't you see how much we are all caring. also I saw a deal on > mustache wax the other day, email fredrick off list for linkage.

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

thank you for the qualified opinion valdis. everyone cares very much. can't you see how much we are all caring. also I saw a deal on mustache wax the other day, email fredrick off list for linkage. On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:10 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 15 May 2008 09:11:37 PDT, Mor

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

Fuck Monty Python. Fucking dorks. Professor Micheal Chatner, MD, CISSP On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:12 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Morning Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anybody who thinks a CISSP is a "license to hack" is dreadfully ignorant o

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Morning Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Anybody who thinks a CISSP is a "license to hack" is dreadfully ignorant >>> of what little overlap there is between hacking skills and the material >>> covered in the CISSP. > > CISSP's cant hack > But a lumberjack can.

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

On Thu, 15 May 2008 09:11:37 PDT, Morning Wood said: > >> Anybody who thinks a CISSP is a "license to hack" is dreadfully ignorant > >> of what little overlap there is between hacking skills and the material > >> covered in the CISSP. > > CISSP's cant hack Right, because the CISSP isn't about hac

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

You know, that's really rude, not to mention incorrect. I should get my CISSP just to prove you wrong. =) On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Morning Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Anybody who thinks a CISSP is a "license to hack" is dreadfully ignorant > >> of what little overlap there is

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

>> Anybody who thinks a CISSP is a "license to hack" is dreadfully ignorant >> of what little overlap there is between hacking skills and the material >> covered in the CISSP. CISSP's cant hack Donnie Werner ( not a ) CISSP http://exploitlabs.com ___

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

It took more than that you fat beast of a man! CISSP is a very high accreditation and only the best of the best can achieve such a level of excellence in their hacking abilities to obtain it. It's basically the PhD of hacking. Why are you putting CISSP in your shit up there like that pretendi

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

Uh, maybe because announcing your CISSP is pretentious enough, but doing it in a username is over the top? Adam John C. A. Bambenek, GCIH, CISSP wrote: > Why? I crammed a whole 2 hours to pass that test. > > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:30 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

Awesome song btw On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:03 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 8:32 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, 14 May 2008 20:14:35 BST, n3td3v said: >> >>> He has a license to hack and it took him two hours to get it. >>> >>> Be fearful of the CI

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 8:32 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2008 20:14:35 BST, n3td3v said: > >> He has a license to hack and it took him two hours to get it. >> >> Be fearful of the CISSP! > > Anybody who thinks a CISSP is a "license to hack" is dreadfully ignorant > of what litt

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

On Wed, 14 May 2008 20:14:35 BST, n3td3v said: > He has a license to hack and it took him two hours to get it. > > Be fearful of the CISSP! Anybody who thinks a CISSP is a "license to hack" is dreadfully ignorant of what little overlap there is between hacking skills and the material covered in

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Adam Chesnutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Uh, maybe because announcing your CISSP is pretentious enough, but doing it > in a username is over the top? > > Adam He has a license to hack and it took him two hours to get it. Be fearful of the CISSP! All the best,

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

Why? I crammed a whole 2 hours to pass that test. On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:30 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:38 AM, Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --On May 13, 2008 6:14:34 PM -0700 Professor Micheal Chatner > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:38 AM, Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --On May 13, 2008 6:14:34 PM -0700 Professor Micheal Chatner > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hey nerds, dweebs, geeks and losers; > > > > I have a song dedication for you. > > > > http://media.odeo.com/6/0/6/fredbl

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks

--On May 13, 2008 6:14:34 PM -0700 Professor Micheal Chatner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey nerds, dweebs, geeks and losers; > > I have a song dedication for you. > > http://media.odeo.com/6/0/6/fredblassie.mp3 > > > Bon Apetit! > Professor Micheal Chatner Well, I see you've dropped the CISSP.

[Full-disclosure] Geeks

Hey nerds, dweebs, geeks and losers; I have a song dedication for you. http://media.odeo.com/6/0/6/fredblassie.mp3 Bon Apetit! Professor Micheal Chatner "Most any night you know where I can be found. Yeah, stomping some geek's head into the ground." ___

Re: [Full-disclosure] Geeks who do art?

www.harddriveart.com   - Original Message - From: Geoff Shively To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 10:17 PM Subject: [Full-disclosure] Geeks who do art? Oi!   I am looking for hax0rz who paint, photo, record, etc for a

[Full-disclosure] Geeks who do art?

Oi!   I am looking for hax0rz who paint, photo, record, etc for a geek art gallery I am setting up. Anyone who is interested in showing their stuff, shoot me a mail.   Cheers, Geoff ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk