n3td3v wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Chris Pritchard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it's your list, and even if it was, you didn't have to be so
rude about it
Its Gadi Evron's list because Mossad told him to make it so. Who's
really in control of the propaganda
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 7:51 PM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability
Hi,
---
Software:
Google Chrome Browser 0.2.149.27
Tested:
Windows XP Professional SP3
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 8:10 PM, hannibal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We all know that Evron is a moronic jew, who cares?
How should the community deal with Gadi Evron emails? Should we be
shooting for a complete ban of cyber politics as well as normal
politics which is already banned?
If people
@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability
Hi,
---
Software:
Google Chrome Browser 0.2.149.27
Tested:
Windows XP Professional SP3
Result:
Google Chrome Crashes with All Tabs
Problem:
An issue
] Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability
Hi,
---
Software:
Google Chrome Browser 0.2.149.27
Tested:
Windows XP Professional SP3
Result:
Google Chrome Crashes with All Tabs
Problem:
An issue exists in how chrome behaves with undefined
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability
dear god people, I've got null ptr derefs in firefox but I don't make
full disclosure posts about them. I care about them nearly as much as
vulnz in a browser no one uses for more than 5 minutes. Get the fuck
off my list.
2008/9/4
On Thursday 04 September 2008 13:46:33 Chris Pritchard wrote:
I don't think it's your list, and even if it was, you didn't have to be
so rude about it
I -- as well as many others in the list I'm sure -- have given up on this
thread. As usual, its popularity is propotional to how much it
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Chris Pritchard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it's your list, and even if it was, you didn't have to be so
rude about it
Its Gadi Evron's list because Mossad told him to make it so. Who's
really in control of the propaganda on this mailing list, Gadi
On 02 Sep 08, at 21:48, Paul Ferguson wrote:
- -- James Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The same thing happened to safari when it came out on windows.
Well, no kidding. :-)
Maybe the flaws that will hound Chrome are due to the fact that
it uses Safari as a codebase?
WebKit != Safari.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Andrew Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02 Sep 08, at 21:48, Paul Ferguson wrote:
- -- James Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The same thing happened to safari when it came out on windows.
Well, no kidding. :-)
Maybe the flaws that will
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Paul Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, well you cannot deny this is a lackluster starting point.
I hope Google can use this inauspicious starting point to build
the advertising empire they desire.
I for one do not welcome the advertisement overlords.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:52 AM, silky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Paul Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, well you cannot deny this is a lackluster starting point.
I hope Google can use this inauspicious starting point to build
the advertising empire they
PT: FODA-SE!
1) Perdao, mas eu nao vi em nenhum lugar voce ajudando em coisa alguma.
2) Eu falo e escrevo em portugues, estou no Brasil. Obrigado mas eu nao
quero postar coisas em ingles para quem quer que seja ler.
Urlan
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM, The Mad Hatter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shut the fuck up
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Urlan
Sent: 3. september 2008 14:37
To: The Mad Hatter
Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability
PT: FODA-SE!
1
Sorry for my mistake.
Urlan
2008/9/3 Fabio N Sarmento [ Gmail ] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So what fuck are you doing here?
This list speak english, if you dont want to, get out.
2008/9/3 Urlan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PT: FODA-SE!
1) Perdao, mas eu nao vi em nenhum lugar voce ajudando em coisa alguma.
So what fuck are you doing here?
This list speak english, if you dont want to, get out.
2008/9/3 Urlan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PT: FODA-SE!
1) Perdao, mas eu nao vi em nenhum lugar voce ajudando em coisa alguma.
2) Eu falo e escrevo em portugues, estou no Brasil. Obrigado mas eu nao
quero postar
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:04:43 BST, n3td3v said:
I think the world's biggest hacker HD Moore
HD is incredibly talented, and deserves a round of applause for Metasploit.
However, a minute's thought will show that we don't have a fucking *clue*
who the world's biggest hacker is. We have plenty of
On 9/3/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I'd place bets that whoever it is, they're on the RBN payroll...
...
If they really were the biggest hacker, why on earth would they work
for a large group that would merely dull their shine and take from
their profits, etc.
No, the
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd place bets that whoever it is, they're on the RBN payroll...
I thought a high ranking security professional like yourself would
stick to facts, not the latest disinformation handed out by so-called
trusted security professionals.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:47:22 -0400 n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd place bets that whoever it is, they're on the RBN payroll...
I thought a high ranking security professional like
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rishi
Narang
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 7:51 PM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability
Hi,
---
Software:
Google Chrome Browser
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:47:22 -0400 n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd place bets that whoever it is, they're on the RBN payroll...
I thought a high ranking security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Even though I had the vulnerability 4 hrs well before the real
publication of the bug and had the exploit along with the some
crash details like int 3 Kernel Exception/Trap @ 0x01002FF3,
different attack cases, exceptions of http/ftp and further
This is an out of bounds memory read that crashes the browser. It
is a major exaggeration to call this a vulnerability, especially
considering this is a beta browser. Not that others haven't already
said it, but people never seem to learn that a browser crash is a
stability issue, not a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My judgment is telling me to just ignore this, but I'll entertain
it with one response.
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:04:34 -0400 Shyaam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a healthy discussion. This topic leads to a very good
question. When
do we call a bug
Out of bound array accesses can be vulnerabilities because they can
in some cases result in code execution, but not in this case. In
this case, it is just an integer underflow that causes a
conditional to evaluate to true that shouldn't have and a byte or
two of memory being read out of
Hi,
---
Software:
Google Chrome Browser 0.2.149.27
Tested:
Windows XP Professional SP3
Result:
Google Chrome Crashes with All Tabs
Problem:
An issue exists in how chrome behaves with undefined-handlers in chrome.dll
version 0.2.149.27. A crash
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Rishi Narang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proof of Concept:
http://evilfingers.com/advisory/google_chrome_poc.php
You didn't manage to jail break the entire browser, thats whats unique
about Chrome, each tab is in jail, so the entire application doesn't
crash. The
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rishi
Narang
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 7:51 PM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability
Hi,
---
Software:
Google Chrome Browser
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Larry Seltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Holy crap, a crash bug in a beta browser!
oh fuck off with referring to it as beta. beta is just a lame tag so
you can release something that you don't entirely trust.
imho if it's beta keep it fucking private. if it's
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Rishi Narang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Larry,
Ya, a beta browser (though I forgot to mention it) but, is there any product
from Google not in Beta ;) Thanks, our searches are not through a beta search
engine. Anyways, it's just an attempt to make it a
I'd recommend you to read
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle#Beta
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:35 PM, silky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Larry Seltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Holy crap, a crash bug in a beta browser!
oh fuck off with
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:58 AM, silky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Jardel Weyrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd recommend you to read
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle#Beta
i'd recommend you re-read my post, and even that link.
beta does
n3td3v escreveu:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:58 AM, silky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Jardel Weyrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd recommend you to read
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle#Beta
i'd recommend you re-read my post,
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Discover it by yourself. Aren't you the bad ass guy of security?
I'm just a member of the public, unemployed and stupid... maybe you
can help me be badass... although i'd rather be a goodass, cause being
badass is
Por que todo esse alvoroço por causa de um bug na versão beta?!
Viagem...
Urlan
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:21 PM, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Discover it by yourself. Aren't you the bad ass guy of security?
On Tuesday 02 September 2008 23:28:33 Urlan wrote:
Por que todo esse alvoroço por causa de um bug na versão beta?!
pt: não seja tão imbecil
en: don't be such a moron
you are lame twice; first for posting in portuguese, then for giving a stupid
negative contribution to the thread. if you don't
/
Contributing Editor, PC Magazine
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rishi
Narang
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 7:51 PM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Google Chrome Browser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- James Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The same thing happened to safari when it came out on windows.
Well, no kidding. :-)
Maybe the flaws that will hound Chrome are due to the fact that
it uses Safari as a codebase?
See also:
39 matches
Mail list logo
