On 4/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Listen up froggy.
>
> Zone-H is no better than Secunia and no better than those cock
> smokers at Attrition. Perhaps you should follow their lead.
> Internet thermometer indeed rectal thermometer that is.
Breaking News: Secunia buy Zo
Listen up froggy.
Zone-H is no better than Secunia and no better than those cock
smokers at Attrition. Perhaps you should follow their lead.
Internet thermometer indeed rectal thermometer that is.
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 02:06:30 -0700 Siegfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>See, you realized
See, you realized you judged them without even opening your browser, and
stop insulting, don't act like a kid thanks.
And yes, they contribute more than you, even if you play the "blackhat
game", i talked about publishing vulns, did you read the name of the
mailing list? it's called "full disclosur
n3td3v is a kid and a troll. But you my stupid dumb fucking fuck
need to check yourself before you lip off about shit you know
nothing about. you have no clue who I am and no clue what I have
or have not done. you on the other hand. bah... too easy..
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 06:09:30 -0700
On 4/19/06, Matthew Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> n3td3v wrote:
> [...]
> > Furthermore, Secunia are the biggest "scene whore" professional
> > website in the industry.
>
> There's no such thing as a "professional scene whore"
Until Se
> This is my last ever Full-Disclosure post...
...and there was much rejoicing.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
http://secunia.com/secunia_research/
one vulnerability? not even a remote system one? did you do better?
and did n3tv3d with his xss advisories and trolls do better?
Be respectful because they contribute more than you
Le Mer 19 avril 2006 15:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> So releasing one vulne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 07:09:11AM +0100, n3td3v wrote:
>
>>>On 4/19/06, Randal T. Rioux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>I don't think the industry needs someone to "verify" an advisory for them.
>
>
> Actually, you are w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
n3td3v wrote:
[...]
> Furthermore, Secunia are the biggest "scene whore" professional
> website in the industry.
Uhh, dude... the scene and the industry are essentially two different
things. There's no such thing as a "professional scene whore"
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 06:11:36 BST, n3td3v said:
> If they did something special with their website like Securityfocus
> does, then I might be able to bare their illegal footer message spam,
"illegal"? Statute or case law citation, please?
And that footer is running around nekkid already, no need
]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Google Groups e-mail disclosure in plain text
> On 4/19/06, Randal T. Rioux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What does SF offer?
>
> People directly post to Securityfocus, it is an original sou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 07:09:11AM +0100, n3td3v wrote:
> On 4/19/06, Randal T. Rioux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think the industry needs someone to "verify" an advisory for them.
Actually, you are wrong there.
More than one company pays mi
So when you are done with your temper tantrum read what you wrote
here:
>I don't think the industry needs someone to "verify" an advisory
>for them.
>
>"Secunia collects, validates, and verifies all vulnerability
>reports
>issued by security research groups, vendors, and others."
>
>People are
On 4/19/06, Randal T. Rioux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What does SF offer?
People directly post to Securityfocus, it is an original source of
information, whereas "Please note: The information, which this Secunia
Advisory is based upon, comes from third party"
Aka they sit on places like Securi
There is no difference between secunia and securityfocus.
They are both bottom of the barrel slime
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:11:36 -0700 n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 4/19/06, Aaron Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Kill Secunia, the illegal high jackers of FD.
>>
>> Personally I would tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
n3td3v wrote:
> If they did something special with their website like Securityfocus
> does, then I might be able to bare their illegal footer message spam,
> and their scene whore republication of advisories they claim are
> Secunia exclusives.
On 4/19/06, Aaron Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Kill Secunia, the illegal high jackers of FD.
>
> Personally I would thank them for providing a good secure server and hosting
> the list.
>
> Aaron
Thank you for spamming us Secunia via the Full-Disclosure footer message.
Furthermore, Secunia
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Gray
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 12:17 AM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Google Groups e-mail disclosure in plain text
> So releasing one vulnerability... and not even a rem
So releasing one vulnerability... and not even a remote system
one... makes them legitimate? They are just as bad as that n3td3v
faggot.
I see everyone gets on well here :)
Aaron
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.or
So releasing one vulnerability... and not even a remote system
one... makes them legitimate? They are just as bad as that n3td3v
faggot.
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:56:42 -0700 Aaron Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>>Kill Secunia, the illegal high jackers of FD.
>
>Yes they release real vulnerablit
>Kill Secunia, the illegal high jackers of FD.
Yes they release real vulnerablities.
See "Internet_Explorer_Address_Bar_Spoofing_Vulnerability_Test":-
http://secunia.com/advisories/19521/
Will disabling or removing Flash till its solved prevent this ?
Installing Google Toolbar and ena
Kill Secunia, the illegal high jackers of FD.
Yes they release real vulnerablities.
See "Internet_Explorer_Address_Bar_Spoofing_Vulnerability_Test":-
http://secunia.com/advisories/19521/
Will disabling or removing Flash till its solved prevent this ?
Aaron
___
> Regards, n3td3v> > Personal:> Kill Secunia, the illegal high jackers of FD.
Personally, I would take offense to being threatened
in that manner
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.
On 4/18/06, Vidar Løkken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, n3td3v wrote:
> > Problem:
> > Google forgot to add obscurity measures for forwarded messages, and so
> > an e-mail address is readable via web interface headers, in plain
> > text.
>
> C'mon people, ensure Mr. 1337 N3tD3v
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, n3td3v wrote:
Problem:
Google forgot to add obscurity measures for forwarded messages, and so
an e-mail address is readable via web interface headers, in plain
text.
C'mon people, ensure Mr. 1337 N3tD3v gets his viagra ads!
--
MVH,
Vidar
You are only young once, but you ca
Vendor:
Google Inc (GOOG).
Service:
Groups.
Description:
Google has an archive of Usenet since 1981 on its network. However,
Google decided to build a new Groups interface known as Google Groups
2 or GG2 for short.
Issue:
Bot network harvesting of e-mail address in plain text via web
interface h
26 matches
Mail list logo
