ahahahahaha <3
You seem to open your mouth fine without finding kernel remotes, must
be practise from all those dicks you put in it.
2009/11/9 Pete Licoln :
> Just find a remote kernel on vista or seven (not an XSS bitch, just a
> kernel remote)
> Then you'll be able to open your big cunt ass f
Just find a remote kernel on vista or seven (not an XSS bitch, just a
kernel remote)
Then you'll be able to open your big cunt ass fuck mouth .
Fuck your e-diner, "sympathy",redneck face
You're a fool, go suck a lemon bitch.
___
Full-Disclosure - We bel
It's true, Laurent is a blackhat. I am glad the security community at
large is accepting this fact. This matter has been passed onto his
soon to be employers.
Aside from that I'm not trolling, just speaking my mind. Something
you're obviously familiar with doing. Can't we be friends? I mean, you
d
Fionnbharr,
laurent is blackhat peace of spit asshole, and you're an attention seeker.
Everyone knows, the only remote bug you can find is an xss or even better a
csrf.
laurent will find some nastie stufft as always, but will totally screw up at
disclosing theses issues (as argumented before the s
That sure would have be some funny words, glad I'm not talking about
how difficult to exploit it is! That would make me look pretty dumb
bringing something totally unrelated to my comment into the argument.
Yeep.
2009/10/29 laurent gaffie :
> Bonjour Fionnbharr Davies!,
>
> I'm glad to ma
Bonjour Fionnbharr Davies!,
I'm glad to make your life easier with the shasum full path, really.
Regarding the "Grossly misdiagnosed bug";
That's some funny words to describe one of the most difficult bug to exploit
in 2009 (http://seclists.org/dailydave/2009/q4/2)
Laurent
Bonjour!
Is this
Bonjour!
Is this going to be another grossly misdiagnosed bug?
Also I'm glad you put that /usr/bin at the start, it would have been
confusing otherwise.
2009/10/27 laurent gaffie :
> For the record :
> /usr/bin/shasum advisory.txt
> 9fefeeb9d3ebf7c6822961e59ae94cfb655bcd53 advisory.txt
>
> Rega
For the record :
/usr/bin/shasum advisory.txt
9fefeeb9d3ebf7c6822961e59ae94cfb655bcd53 advisory.txt
Regards,
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://
75ca3011ae2a15f851cc3334cf7918ae851c92f1
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Dear List,
9a663ed9f95a2ddd03bd1a4ec58f2b6f
Just a prediction LOLOLOL.
J
--
Hotel pics, info and virtual tours. Click here to book a hotel online.
http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4eRCkidEaat7unpUBxI9K9qYMbCwROv3YNcQTNelZnVF5lEk/
___
Full-Disclo
fucktard morons, (now write me a 10 paragraph response, im waiting!)
On 7/27/07, Tremaine Lea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 27-Jul-07, at 7:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 18:23:37 MDT, Tremaine Lea said:
> >
> >> A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27-Jul-07, at 7:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 18:23:37 MDT, Tremaine Lea said:
>
>> Apparently you've never heard of a mail administrator tagging
>> outbound email for all users. It's pretty common. Of course, you may
>> la
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 18:23:37 MDT, Tremaine Lea said:
> Apparently you've never heard of a mail administrator tagging
> outbound email for all users. It's pretty common. Of course, you may
> lack the experience of dealing with large companies.
The fact a large company does it doesn't make it
Nick FitzGerald wrote:
> shadown wrote:
>
>
>> Just some hashed for the record.
>>
>> CA eTrust (vulnpack):
>> md5:919a7645a07aafb388af00e9b39d21bf
>> sha-1:b21f31892fff9de9bd6933850a66587786896fa1
>> SHA-256:66fd618e17bfe7db223f9547df15763d8246a49bbd6bbd7aee01964f2537bf86
>>
>
> Cool -- th
Oh Nick, you're so dreamy!
J
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:20:27 -0400 Nick FitzGerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
l.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>shadown wrote:
>
>> Just some hashed for the record.
>>
>> CA eTrust (vulnpack):
>> md5:919a7645a07aafb388af00e9b39d21bf
>> sha-1:b21f31892fff9de9bd6933850a66587786896fa1
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You're kidding. You must not have been receiving the list in the
last 24 hours then ;)
Cheers,
- ---
Tremaine Lea
Network Security Consultant
Intrepid ACL
"Paranoia for hire"
On 26-Jul-07, at 9:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've heard of g
@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Hash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-Jul-07, at 8:52 PM, Peter Besenbruch wrote:
> Tremaine Lea wrote:
>> Sure, it's possible. Possibly Sergio is lazy. As he sent it via
>> gmail's auth smtp servers and not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-Jul-07, at 8:52 PM, Peter Besenbruch wrote:
> Tremaine Lea wrote:
>> Sure, it's possible. Possibly Sergio is lazy. As he sent it via
>> gmail's auth smtp servers and not from webmail, it's just as possible
>> it happened in his mail client.
>
Tremaine Lea wrote:
> Sure, it's possible. Possibly Sergio is lazy. As he sent it via
> gmail's auth smtp servers and not from webmail, it's just as possible
> it happened in his mail client.
And he still could have, and should have edited it.
> And all of that aside, who cares? We see sig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-Jul-07, at 7:17 PM, Ronald MacDonald wrote:
> On 27/07/07, Tremaine Lea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Apparently you've never heard of a mail administrator tagging
>> outbound email for all users. It's pretty common. Of course, you may
>> lack
On 27/07/07, Tremaine Lea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently you've never heard of a mail administrator tagging
> outbound email for all users. It's pretty common. Of course, you may
> lack the experience of dealing with large companies.
>
> Have a nice day.
>
> - ---
> Tremaine Lea
> Network
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>>
>> This message is confidential. ...
>
> Yet you wilfully and knowingly posted it to a public-access mailing
> list with tens of thousands of subscribers and that is well-known
> to be
> archived in many places across the net?
>
> You must be a
shadown wrote:
> Just some hashed for the record.
>
> CA eTrust (vulnpack):
> md5:919a7645a07aafb388af00e9b39d21bf
> sha-1:b21f31892fff9de9bd6933850a66587786896fa1
> SHA-256:66fd618e17bfe7db223f9547df15763d8246a49bbd6bbd7aee01964f2537bf86
Cool -- thanks for that info...
> --
> Sergio Alvarez
>
Just some hashed for the record.
CA eTrust (vulnpack):
md5:919a7645a07aafb388af00e9b39d21bf
sha-1:b21f31892fff9de9bd6933850a66587786896fa1
SHA-256:66fd618e17bfe7db223f9547df15763d8246a49bbd6bbd7aee01964f2537bf86
--
Sergio Alvarez
Security, Research & Development
IT Security Consultant
email: [EM
Can someone please tell me if these are DES hashes, or if they could
be oracle hashes? I cannot get JTR to crack them, which leades me to
believe they may not be DES. Any help please?
Username: UCN016
Password Hash: 8F789BA55BA187380BA1
___
Full-Disclosu
25 matches
Mail list logo
