On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 22:53 -0500, Todd Troxell wrote:
> Noticing lots of admins tend to forget about /server-status, I typed at
> random:
> I am sure there are ten billion others. In some cases this is worse than
> someone grabbing your access log.
>
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=
Well I find is more serious to find /server-info availabable on one of
thats,
you could rebuild some important information on the apache
configuration, modules, directives, etc..
Alessandro Fiorenzi
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 22:53 -0500, Todd Troxell wrote:
> Noticing lots of admins tend to forget
WOW!
2007/7/22, John Kinsella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> also fun is /server-info...
>
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:53:42PM -0500, Todd Troxell wrote:
> > Noticing lots of admins tend to forget about /server-status, I typed at
> > random:
> >
> > http://www.cnn.com/server-status
> > http://www.websho
also fun is /server-info...
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:53:42PM -0500, Todd Troxell wrote:
> Noticing lots of admins tend to forget about /server-status, I typed at
> random:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/server-status
> http://www.webshots.com/server-status
> http://www.download.com/server-status
> htt
wow.
coolest thing ever.
can't blame people. apache don't even disable it.
http://www.apache.org/server-status
nice find!
On 7/22/07, Todd Troxell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Noticing lots of admins tend to forget about /server-status, I typed at
> random:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/server-sta
Noticing lots of admins tend to forget about /server-status, I typed at random:
http://www.cnn.com/server-status
http://www.webshots.com/server-status
http://www.download.com/server-status
http://slashdot.org/server-status
I am sure there are ten billion others. In some cases this is worse than
