-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yup, CCEs and default configurations/passwords are definitely quite
common. The folks over at gnucitizen have been hitting on this for
some time with their work on the bt home hub...
Elazar
On Fri, 23 May 2008 12:16:45 -0400 Paul Schmehl
<[EMAIL PROT
--On Friday, May 23, 2008 11:56:15 -0400 Elazar Broad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Its not even funny how often this happens. I have a friend who does
> some consulting work for small businesses, and the amount of times
> that he has come across
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Its not even funny how often this happens. I have a friend who does
some consulting work for small businesses, and the amount of times
that he has come across medical practices that run their billing
and record keeping software on the same "fully-loade
--On Thursday, May 22, 2008 20:45:06 -0700 coderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Daniel Sichel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> My management here wants to put a server on our LAN, not administered by us
>> ...
>
> all of the responses to this are retarded.
>
> tell
Hi Izaac,
>> it's not documented anywhere. So, please help me explain why
>> netbios and file shares on machines not within your network are bad
>> ideas.
>
> This situation is ultimately and entirely your fault.
>
> You, i.e. your IT department, has failed to provide the services and
> resourc
]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel
Sichel
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 12:51 PM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Need some help with management
My management here wants to put a server on our LAN, not administered by
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 09:51:01AM -0700, Daniel Sichel wrote:
> it's not documented anywhere. So, please help me explain why netbios and
> file shares on machines not within your network are bad ideas.
This situation is ultimately and entirely your fault.
You, i.e. your IT department, has failed
;liability argument. Managers understand liability and the bottom line.
>- - Original Message -
>From: Daniel Sichel
>To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
>Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 12:51 PM
>Subject: [Full-disclosure] Need some help with management
>My management
Hi Daniel,
There are a great many reasons why this is a bad idea, and I'm sure you
actually know most of them. If your management isn't buying the
rationale behind not allowing untrusted systems on the network, my
suggestion would be to put them on the spot and ask them to absolve you,
and your t
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Daniel Sichel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My management here wants to put a server on our LAN, not administered by us
> ...
all of the responses to this are retarded.
tell him to setup a server. dare him. double dog dare!
when it pings, load it full of goatse.c
ssage -
From: Daniel Sichel
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 12:51 PM
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Need some help with management
My management here wants to put a server on our LAN, not administered by us
(the IT department) and use a share on it to serve file
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Schmehl
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 2:25 PM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Need some help with management
--On Thursday, May 22, 2008 09:51:01 -0700 Daniel Sichel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> M
--On Thursday, May 22, 2008 09:51:01 -0700 Daniel Sichel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> My management here wants to put a server on our LAN, not administered by us
> (the IT department) and use a share on it to serve files and data to our
> workstations. They do not understand why having a ser
adam, hoss and lil joe (and ben)
say yeeha! lets pown your ponderosa!
;)
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
On Thu, 22 May 2008 09:51:01 PDT, Daniel Sichel said:
> bad idea to drive on the left hand side of the road. It's just so basic
> it's not documented anywhere. So, please help me explain why netbios and
> file shares on machines not within your network are bad ideas.
Ask him if he issues building
My management here wants to put a server on our LAN, not administered by
us (the IT department) and use a share on it to serve files and data to
our workstations. They do not understand why having a server with a
file share that is NOT part of our secure infrastructure represents a
threat to the c
16 matches
Mail list logo
