You really have a desktop icon for every possible option set for every
tool you have?
It's not a coincidence that the entire industry disagrees with you. Get
tool-agnostic and accept that there are quite a few tasks for which the
CLI is better suited.
Or keep using winnuke95 or whatever.
Markus
Just stop it, you're embarrassing yourself...
Markus Jansson wrote:
OK, OK, I get your point. If you use GUI, you are lamer, because you
could do fine without them 20 years ago so you should be able to do
just fine without them now too. Its just lazy mans way of doing
things to use GUI, and
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:36:07PM +0200, Markus Jansson wrote:
OK, OK, I get your point. If you use GUI, you are lamer, because you
could do fine without them 20 years ago so you should be able to do
just fine without them now too. Its just lazy mans way of doing
things to use GUI, and
Salut,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:36:07 +0200 Markus Jansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, OK, I get your point.
No, you don't.
If you use GUI, you are lamer, because you
could do fine without them 20 years ago so you should be able to do
just fine without them now too.
No, if you use a GUI,
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:36:07 +0200, Markus Jansson said:
(BTW. My doubleclicking on desktop icon is maybe 200x faster than you
writing two lines of command line crap to get the program to do the
same thing I make it do with just doubleclicking it with my mouse.)
Bullshit. A GUI is *fine* - if
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:40:21 +0200, Markus Jansson said:
Make .bat / .cmd file that has that in it and save it in desktop. Next
time you need that, doubleclick that and have a party.
OK, now I'm thoroughly convinced that you're trying to be intentionally
dense. You missed two points:
1)
OK, OK, I get your point. If you use GUI, you are lamer, because you
could do fine without them 20 years ago so you should be able to do
just fine without them now too. Its just lazy mans way of doing
things to use GUI, and especially lazy and now knowledge enought
peoples way of doing things.
