At 07:39 p.m. 03/09/2008, Jerome Benoit wrote:
We have published a revision of our IETF Internet-Draft about port
randomization. It is available at:
http://www.gont.com.ar/drafts/port-randomization/draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-rand
omization-02.txt (you can find the document in other fancy
Le Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:44:35 -0300,
Fernando Gont [EMAIL PROTECTED] a osé(e) écrire :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Folks,
We have published a revision of our IETF Internet-Draft about port
randomization. It is available at:
At 04:50 p.m. 01/09/2008, coderman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Fernando Gont
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... IETF Internet-Draft about port randomization...
wget -qO -
http://www.gont.com.ar/drafts/port-randomization/draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization-02.txt
| grep -i grsec
is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:51:35 CDT, rholgstad said:
Linus doesn't care about security
No, he actually *does* care about security - he's just pf the opinion
that security fixes don't automatically rate a 'ZOMG! PWNED!' flag on
them like certain *BSD variants think. He
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:06 AM, Fernando Gont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... there's no description of what Windows does
some things speak for themselves... :)
Also, the base Linux system already implements Algorithm #3... why
... patch
if you seed/key #3 poorly, as just one example. (which
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:17:43 +0800, Pavel Labushev said:
SECURITY PATCH tag on a fix helps me to know that there is the problem
and I must consider the patch, check its correctness and maybe
test/backport/apply it to my production systems ASAP. Just as another
tags helps me to know that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?:
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:17:43 +0800, Pavel Labushev said:
SECURITY PATCH tag on a fix helps me to know that there is the problem
and I must consider the patch, check its correctness and maybe
test/backport/apply it to my production systems ASAP. Just as another
At 11:15 a.m. 02/09/2008, coderman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:06 AM, Fernando Gont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... there's no description of what Windows does
some things speak for themselves... :)
What speaks for itself?
Our work is a proposal for a few alternatives for doing port
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Fernando Gont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... IETF Internet-Draft about port randomization...
wget -qO -
http://www.gont.com.ar/drafts/port-randomization/draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization-02.txt
| grep -i grsec
is still empty. why do you dismiss grsec?
Linus doesn't care about security
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or you can get Linus to merge the code in question. See the the helpful info
in the file Documentation/SubmittingPatches. You want to send them to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list for review, that's where the network developers
hang out.
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:51:35 CDT, rholgstad said:
Linus doesn't care about security
No, he actually *does* care about security - he's just pf the opinion
that security fixes don't automatically rate a 'ZOMG! PWNED!' flag on
them like certain *BSD variants think. He thinks that sticking a big
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Folks,
We have published a revision of our IETF Internet-Draft about port
randomization. It is available at:
http://www.gont.com.ar/drafts/port-randomization/draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-rand
omization-02.txt (you can find the document in other fancy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Folks,
We have published a revision of our IETF Internet-Draft about port
randomization. It is available at:
http://www.gont.com.ar/drafts/port-randomization/draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-rand
omization-02.txt (you can find the document in other fancy
13 matches
Mail list logo
