On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 14:49 -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
snip
Don't security professionals know how to use email
for god's sake?
Hi! You must be new to the list - little tip, but keep it to yourself;
Full Disclosure isn't entirely populated by security professionals ;)
/flippancy
- James.
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005, Brian Dessent wrote:
Robert Kim Wireless Internet Advisor wrote:
Nick, hi... why would you want to filter out the digests? will this
eliminate digests from my subscriptioin?
It would have nothing to do with *sending* the digests, and everything
to do with stopping
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 10:10:10PM -0600, Ron DuFresne wrote:
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005, Brian Dessent wrote:
Robert Kim Wireless Internet Advisor wrote:
Don't security professionals know how to use email
for god's sake?
What makes you think at this day in age, security professionals are no
Nick, hi... why would you want to filter out the digests? will this
eliminate digests from my subscriptioin?
On 11/2/05, Nick FitzGerald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martinez, Tino (Tempe) wrote:
Yes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Robert Kim Wireless Internet Advisor wrote:
Nick, hi... why would you want to filter out the digests? will this
eliminate digests from my subscriptioin?
It would have nothing to do with *sending* the digests, and everything
to do with stopping tards that hit reply to a 70kb digest containing
Yes
Note to list admins -- add filtering rule to reject messages with
Subject: lines matching *Digest, Vol*...
Nick, hi... why would you want to filter out the digests? will this
eliminate digests from my subscriptioin?
He is saying to filter the replies to the digest that have the
Martinez, Tino (Tempe) wrote:
Yes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 10:42 PM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 9, Issue 3
69KB of