Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this

2006-09-13 Thread bkfsec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's not a joke Gary. If you are attempting to make the claim that Saddam NEVER had WMD you are either Profoundly Misinformed, Astonishingly Ignorant of Late 20th Century History; or simply Lying. Wow. How utterly intellectually dishonest of you... Saying that

[Full-disclosure] RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this.

2006-09-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nick FitzGerald - === So you agree with the thinking part of the world that GWB and his so- called advisors are a bunch of idiots... == I don't recall seeing your credentials for even belonging to that group, let alone the memo that appointed

Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this.

2006-09-13 Thread Nick FitzGerald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to me: === So you agree with the thinking part of the world that GWB and his so- called advisors are a bunch of idiots... == I don't recall seeing your credentials for even belonging to that group, let alone the memo

Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this

2006-09-12 Thread c0ntex
Good sir, if what you say be true, show me your proof. Also, using your medical training, explain the injuries to the bodies in Falluja. Thanks :-) On 12/09/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Contex - If you consider that America

Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this

2006-09-12 Thread bkfsec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you consider that America are able to lie about the weapons of mass destruction and then admit it, America never lied about WMD. America is not in a position to prove that any WMD

Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this

2006-09-12 Thread c0ntex
On 12/09/06, bkfsec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you two are using different definitions for Chemical Weapons, perhaps. I think so, though chemical weapons have been used. There are hundereds / thousands of bodies that have been melted almost to the bone, while their clothes are in

Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this

2006-09-12 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Tuesday, September 12, 2006 09:12:14 +0100 c0ntex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good sir, if what you say be true, show me your proof. Also, using your medical training, explain the injuries to the bodies in Falluja. This is stupid. There's tons of documentation in the public domain that

Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this

2006-09-12 Thread Nick FitzGerald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip tirade But anyone who FIRST decides what they want to believe and THEN tries to find supporting evidence for it is an IDIOT. People who are NOT idiots do it the other way around: Evidence First, Conclusion Second. So you agree with the thinking part of the world

[Full-disclosure] RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this

2006-09-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contex - If you consider that America are able to lie about the weapons of mass destruction and then admit it, America never lied about WMD. America is not in a position to prove that any WMD stockpiles existed

[Full-disclosure] Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this

2006-09-09 Thread c0ntex
Another: http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-5702006622816922747 Makes me sick. On 10/09/06, c0ntex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-5587990522549547050 -- regards c0ntex -- regards c0ntex ___