funny example and i totally agree on this.
if you subscribe to an unmoderated list you have to expect that you
may have to config your mail filter if you want to get rid of certain crap.
procmail is great for that.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:34:24 EST, Sol Invictus said:
> Everyone on the Internet carries the responsibility to secure the
> machines under their control. It's the same here. If people can't
> control themselves, then one must take the necessary steps to protect
> themselves.
"Usenet is like a
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:25:42 EST, Micheal Espinola Jr said:
> On SPF: Perhaps some of the bogus impersonation posts would get
> caught/blocked by a simple SPF check?
The problem with SPF is that it requires the manager of the purported source
domain to configure it, and possibly to take other ac
On 3/21/06, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am unsubscribing from the list now,
>
> I know when i'm not wanted :-)
>
> ENJOY
>
>
Yeah, we have heard that before. If you do though www.n3td3v.com will dissappear
after one year of silence. Alll though the quotes section may be expanded with
Point taken,
I will now unsubscribe and never be seen again.
Problem solved,
n3td3v
On 3/21/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's certainly easy to take that position (as I previously did aswell), but this list does not represent the Internet as a whole and in
that respect
It's certainly easy to take that position (as I previously did as
well), but this list does not represent the Internet as a whole and in
that respect it is not comparative. This list has a very particular
audience, and it has a very specific intent.
I'm here for Full Disclosure - not the town squ
This list is unmoderated just like the entire Internet. If we're going
to moderate this list, why not the entire Internet? It's the way Al
Gore would have wanted it!
Everyone on the Internet carries the responsibility to secure the
machines under their control. It's the same here. If peopl
No he shouldn't. Because if people cannot moderate themselves from
childish behavior, and if this list is the target of repeated abuse,
it needs some sort of check.
I don't think anyone here wants to see actual content moderation - and
I don't think that's the answer to the problem anyways. And c
March 21, 2006 8:59 PM
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Re: Noise on the list
> Edward Pearson wrote:
> > I shouldn't have to get the fucking spamfilter involved when we're
> > talking about a mailing list.
>
> Yes, you fucking should. This is a NON-moderated list.
Edward Pearson wrote:
> I shouldn't have to get the fucking spamfilter involved when we're
> talking about a mailing list.
Yes, you fucking should. This is a NON-moderated list. There are plenty
of perfectly good moderated lists out there which you won't have to filter.
But /this/ list is a
10 matches
Mail list logo
