[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:31:53 EDT, Joey Mengele said:
So are you trying to suggest compression is not as secure as
encryption? Have you even *read* the RFC in question?
The design goal of most compression algorithms is that *anybody* can take
the compressed data
2008/4/22 Joey Mengele [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Valdis,
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:53:55 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:31:53 EDT, Joey Mengele said:
So are you trying to suggest compression is not as secure as
encryption? Have you even *read* the RFC in question?
Valdis,
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:53:55 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:31:53 EDT, Joey Mengele said:
So are you trying to suggest compression is not as secure as
encryption? Have you even *read* the RFC in question?
The design goal of most compression algorithms is that
But, but, feet are tasty.
I can't believe people are commenting in here not knowing that FTP is
plaintext. Any infosec 101 book will tell you this. Along with telnet.
Don't use them, use the secure alternatives, such as FTPS or SFTP
(which is indeed a subprocess of SSH, look at sshd.conf if you
Valdis,
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:57:12 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:04:41 EDT, Joey Mengele said:
I think you are mistaken. Perhaps you have an outdated version
of
the document in question?
No, it is you that is sadly mistaken.
IETF RFCs are not versioned. If
Michael,
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:51:54 -0400 Micheal Cottingham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, but, feet are tasty.
Uhhh ?
I can't believe people are commenting in here not knowing that FTP
is
plaintext. Any infosec 101 book will tell you this. Along with
telnet.
Most 'infosec 101' books
Micheal Cottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
techie.michael .. enough said, go back to geek squad and stay off the list
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:04:19 EDT, Joey Mengele said:
Exactly, I was talking about the RFC that supersedes that
particular RFC.
0959 File Transfer Protocol. J. Postel, J. Reynolds. October 1985.
(Format: TXT=147316 bytes) (Obsoletes RFC0765) (Updated by RFC2228,
RFC2640, RFC2773,
Valdis,
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:43:57 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:04:19 EDT, Joey Mengele said:
Exactly, I was talking about the RFC that supersedes that
particular RFC.
0959 File Transfer Protocol. J. Postel, J. Reynolds. October 1985.
(Format: TXT=147316
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:46:42 EDT, Joey Mengele said:
I don't have time to hold your hand through this,
Otherwise known as you're trying to weasel your way out of having to
admit that you didn't have a clue what you were talking about.
some of
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:21:21 PDT, Andrew Farmer said:
There is a 3.4.3 in RFC 959 which discusses a COMPRESSED MODE, which
might look superficially like encryption to the untrained eye.
You obviously tuned in late. ;)
When 3.4.3 was pointed out to Joey, he claimed he meant 4.4.3, and
Funny. Except I never worked for Geek Squad. Nor do I want to. And
I'll stay on this list if I so choose, ktnxbai.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 3:25 PM, reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Micheal Cottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
techie.michael .. enough said, go back to geek squad and stay off the
Andrew,
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:21:21 -0400 Andrew Farmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21 Apr 08, at 12:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:04:19 EDT, Joey Mengele said:
Exactly, I was talking about the RFC that supersedes that
particular RFC.
0959 File Transfer Protocol. J.
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:31:53 EDT, Joey Mengele said:
So are you trying to suggest compression is not as secure as
encryption? Have you even *read* the RFC in question?
The design goal of most compression algorithms is that *anybody* can take
the compressed data and get back the original. The
: [Full-disclosure] Security issue in Filezilla
3.0.9.2:passwordsare stored in plain text (sitemanager.xml)
Valdis,
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:24:13 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3.4.3. COMPRESSED MODE
There are three kinds of information to be sent: regular
data,
sent
15 matches
Mail list logo
