Re: [Full-disclosure] Security predictions for 2009

2008-12-07 Thread Ureleet
u rnt that lucky son. On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:53 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 6:31 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:23:32 GMT, n3td3v said: >>> I'm not a troll I wanted your security predictions, its people like >>> you botching the list

Re: [Full-disclosure] Security predictions for 2009

2008-12-07 Thread Ureleet
ll? oh boy... >> >> Exibar >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "n3td3v" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: >> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 12:24 PM >> Subject: [Full-disclosure] Security predictions for 2009 >> &

Re: [Full-disclosure] Security predictions for 2009

2008-12-07 Thread Tonu Samuel
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 12:52 -0500, Exibar wrote: > My prediction is that n3td3v will remain and torment us more with > his/their/its/her unwanted rubbish on this list and will never ever leave as > was once promissed > > > why am I feeding the troll? oh boy... Only thing which migh

Re: [Full-disclosure] Security predictions for 2009

2008-12-05 Thread Exibar
al Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "n3td3v" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Exibar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 1:31 PM Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Security predictions for 2009 > On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:23:32 GMT, n3t

Re: [Full-disclosure] Security predictions for 2009

2008-12-05 Thread n3td3v
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 6:31 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:23:32 GMT, n3td3v said: >> I'm not a troll I wanted your security predictions, its people like >> you botching the list up not me. > > The basic problem is that you've *been* either a blithering idiot or a > troll

Re: [Full-disclosure] Security predictions for 2009

2008-12-05 Thread opticfiber
Listen, all this back and forth about list noise is easily fixable please see attached. -Bill On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:31 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:23:32 GMT, n3td3v said: > > I'm not a troll I wanted your security predictions, its people like > > you botching the l

Re: [Full-disclosure] Security predictions for 2009

2008-12-05 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:23:32 GMT, n3td3v said: > I'm not a troll I wanted your security predictions, its people like > you botching the list up not me. The basic problem is that you've *been* either a blithering idiot or a troll for so long, that even if something sensible *does* get posted from n

Re: [Full-disclosure] Security predictions for 2009

2008-12-05 Thread ghost
; >> Exibar >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "n3td3v" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: >> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 12:24 PM >> Subject: [Full-disclosure] Security predictions for 2009 >> >> >>> We

Re: [Full-disclosure] Security predictions for 2009

2008-12-05 Thread n3td3v
his list and will never ever leave as > was once promissed > > > why am I feeding the troll? oh boy... > > Exibar > > > - Original Message - > From: "n3td3v" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 12:24 PM >

Re: [Full-disclosure] Security predictions for 2009

2008-12-05 Thread Exibar
ROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 12:24 PM Subject: [Full-disclosure] Security predictions for 2009 > We here at n3td3v would like to hear your security predictions for 2009. > > Last time Paul Ferguson said 2008 would be the year of web 2.0 bugs > and web 2.0 worms,

[Full-disclosure] Security predictions for 2009

2008-12-05 Thread n3td3v
We here at n3td3v would like to hear your security predictions for 2009. Last time Paul Ferguson said 2008 would be the year of web 2.0 bugs and web 2.0 worms, that turned out to be utter rubbish (He does work for Trend Micro afterall), but in true tradition, let's here some of your predictions th