Re: [Full-disclosure] Self-contained XSS Attacks (the new generation of XSS)

com,[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Self-contained XSS Attacks (the new generation of XSS)Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:03:11 -0400Hello pdp, http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/self-contained-xss-attacks XSS attacks can be persistent and non-persistent. Persistent XS

[Full-disclosure] Self-contained XSS Attacks (the new generation of XSS)

http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/self-contained-xss-attacks XSS attacks can be persistent and non-persistent. Persistent XSS is more dangerous since it allow attackers to control exploited clients for longer. On the other hand non-persistent XSS is considered less dangerous although it has been

Re: [Full-disclosure] Self-contained XSS Attacks (the new generation of XSS)

Hello pdp, http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/self-contained-xss-attacks XSS attacks can be persistent and non-persistent. Persistent XSS is more dangerous since it allow attackers to control exploited clients for longer. On the other hand non-persistent XSS is considered less dangerous

Re: [Full-disclosure] Self-contained XSS Attacks (the new generation of XSS)

hi there, personally I don't care if it is a new or old vector :) to be completely honest with you but thanks for the clarifications. I will leave it to you guys to decide. cheers Tim On 9/22/06, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello pdp,