At 02:20 a.m. 09/12/2007, reepex wrote:
holy shit batman!
~$ grep -i grsec draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization-00.txt
~$
as stated by the last person its very strange you do not mention
grsecurity in your
"Survey of the algorithms in use by some popular implementations"
Can anybody please
On Dec 9, 2007 2:20 AM, reepex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ~$ grep -i grsec draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization-00.txt
> ~$
>
> as stated by the last person its very strange you do not mention grsecurity
> in your
> "Survey of the algorithms in use by some popular implementations"
Well, it's jus
holy shit batman!
~$ grep -i grsec draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization-00.txt
~$
as stated by the last person its very strange you do not mention grsecurity
in your
"Survey of the algorithms in use by some popular implementations"
Are you a developer of selinux or a close friend/relative/lover
Vladimir,
Our draft discusses many port randomization approaches. Some of them were
taken from existing implementations (e.g., Algorithm 1 was taken from
OpenBSD).
However, Algorithm 3 was first described (AFAICT) in Michael Larsen's "port
randomization" paper (the first version of our port rando
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Strangely enough this stuff exists for more than 3 years ... Think GRSEC
and more specifically Network stack randomization.
Well of course bow to IETF for accepting this for draft ...
Fernando Gont wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We have published a revision of
Folks,
We have published a revision of our port randomization paper. This is
the first revision of the document since it was accepted as a working
group item of the tsvwg working group of the IETF (Internet
Engineering Task Force). Any feedback on the proposed/described
algorithms will be welc
