No way did I just google for that; I'm actually working on a rewrite in
ObscureLNG/S, and I've been following the progress of the original project
closely. Besides, it's not as if that plug is supported anyway; it was
written with OS X 10.1 support, and is broken on later versions. The
windows vers
That is totally untrue. There is a partially-working and unmaintained
project on github that totally allows you to skip the plug, if you're
willing to just put in a bit of time to setup the entire suite of tools
necessary to run this one project.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Thor wrote:
> H
Ah, well that's the problem then. At lion they dropped all support for
Rosetta. But there you have it! Mine is *better*. Now we don't have to
debate... Wait. Crap!
Sent from whatever device will keep us from debating which one is better.
On Aug 13, 2012, at 9:55 AM, Stefan Edwards wrote:
org.uk] On Behalf Of Thor
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 12:49 PM
To: Stefan Edwards
Cc: full-disclosure
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Tech journalists: Stop hyping unproven
security tools
What, you just Google for that?? You've clearly not tried that fix or you'd
know how hard it
What, you just Google for that?? You've clearly not tried that fix or you'd
know how hard it is to solder that thing. Well, unless you've got really
expensive equipment. And what do you do if you are out and it breaks? I'll
stick with mine, thank you!!
t
On Aug 13, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Stefa
Hell yeah I am. It's the only thing I could find that would sync up to that
other thing, unless you buy the thing that plugs into the other thing!
On Aug 13, 2012, at 9:00 AM, Lincoln Anderson wrote:
>
> Sent from whatever device will keep us from debating which one is better.
>
>
> You're
>
>
> Sent from whatever device will keep us from debating which one is better.
>
>
You're seriously using that thing? I've found it's restricted [vendor term
for application library] is a huge detriment to an already ailing product.
You should probably just switch to the more popular Whichever P
The first and most obvious point is that they are NOT journalists. They
are "monkey read, monkey write" content pushers with no regard for truth,
accuracy, or fairness.
Look at what's happened with the Apple thing. One monkey reads what another
monkey wrote, figures it's true, and writes
*Cui bono
*
http://paranoia.dubfire.net/2012/07/tech-journalists-stop-hyping-unproven.html?utm_source=Contextly&utm_medium=RelatedLinks&utm_campaign=AroundWeb
ouch
http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2012/08/10/experts-idiots-war-security-165251/
___
Full
