[Full-disclosure] Vulnerabilities in Client Service for NetWare

2006-11-16 Thread David_Marcus
McAfee, Inc. McAfee(r) Avert(r) Labs Security Advisory Public Release Date: 2006-11-16 Vulnerabilities in Client Service for NetWare CVE-2006-4688, CVE-2006-4689 ___ * Synopsis The Client Service for NetWare (CS

Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerabilities in Client Service for NetWare

2006-11-16 Thread Cyrus Grissom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 interestingi didnt know that avert was in the business of publishing vunls...dont recall seeing any others? first time? i dont remember seeing it in my 'McAfee Avert Labs Threat News' email alert? would have been nice... and what the hell is thi

Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerabilities in Client Service for NetWare

2006-11-16 Thread El Camino
This isn't AVERT's first published vuln. Most security professionals do list some certs and sigs. Don't take it out on him if you got kicked out of school or can't pass the A+ exam. On 11/16/06, Cyrus Grissom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > inter

Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerabilities in Client Service for NetWare

2006-11-16 Thread daylasoul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:48:25 -0600 El Camino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >This isn't AVERT's first published vuln. Most security >professionals >do list some certs and sigs. > >Don't take it out on him if you got kicked out of school or can't >pass >th

Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerabilities in Client Service for NetWare

2006-11-17 Thread Dave \"No, not that one\" Korn
Cyrus Grissom wrote: > and what the hell is this, "Dave Marcus, B.A., CCNA, MCSE"? are > you letting everyone know that you have a bachelor's of arts > degree? a "Security Research and Communications Manager" who > advertises that he has a ba, a ccna and a mcse...you're such a > schmuckhow ab

Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerabilities in Client Service for NetWare

2006-11-17 Thread Dave \"No, not that one\" Korn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Please take disagreements, flames, and arguments off the list if > possible. Reposting the entire thing makes you a hypocrite. Why is it ok for YOU to post that message but not ok for the OP to post it? Answer: it isn't. How about getting the bloody tree trunk o

Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerabilities in Client Service for NetWare

2006-11-17 Thread daylasoul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:01:12 -0600 "Dave \"No, not that one\" Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Please take disagreements, flames, and arguments off the list if >> possible. > > Reposting the entire thing makes you a hypo

Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerabilities in Client Service for NetWare

2006-11-19 Thread Dave \"No, not that one\" Korn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Per charter, please take politics off list. What does that suggest to you? cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/