> From: Simon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Untitled
>
> Cc: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:27:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] iDefense Q-1 2007 Challenge -I WILL BUY FO
n Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Untitled
Cc: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:27:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] iDefense Q-1 2007 Challenge -I WILL BUY FOR MORE
Oh,
About your ROI question, that
neither did he, he just reiterated your previous assertion of the
possibility of a $75k windfall for an exploit and made a comment about
that assertion.
**
Simon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to K, Untitled, contributor, b
Stick to beer, hard liquor seems to make you an angry drunk.
-sb
On 1/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course you will, the companhy "you sell to" never found more
> than 4 vulns in their existence.
>
> You're the cheap sales man selling insurance, where's your
> USD750.oo
Of course you will, the companhy "you sell to" never found more
than 4 vulns in their existence.
You're the cheap sales man selling insurance, where's your
USD750.ooo vuln EXPERT VULN GUY ?
No where, and neither the shithole comany, which is yours, ever
passed even 1 UsD through your company i
You're right... I'll start ignoring you now. ;)
On 1/19/07 1:50 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> typical con artist - worng focus FUCKFACE
>
> PROOF YOUR BONA FIDES VIA .LAWYER OR .ACCUNTANT. EVEN ONE NICKEL
> GIVEN FOR A VULN. LET ALONE 750 MILLION.
>
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2007
typical con artist - worng focus FUCKFACE
PROOF YOUR BONA FIDES VIA .LAWYER OR .ACCUNTANT. EVEN ONE NICKEL
GIVEN FOR A VULN. LET ALONE 750 MILLION.
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 01:42:43 -0500 Simon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Dumbass, you must be a part of the n3td3v ccr3w or something.
>
>How did
Dumbass, you must be a part of the n3td3v ccr3w or something.
How did you go from 75,000 to 750,000?
On 1/19/07 1:38 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Number one:
>
> 1. An affidavit from your soliciters or accountant's that
> USD750.000 has ever been dispensed through your
Number one:
1. An affidavit from your soliciters or accountant's that
USD750.000 has ever been dispensed through your company or your
proxy company
2. An affidavit from your solictier's or accounttants, that you,
your so-called "client (who is you sno shit) have ever paid out
"upto" 750.ooo u
Dear NoBalls,
What specifically is a "fuckface" anyway and why are you hiding behind
an anonymous email account?
More importantly, my words were not:
"SAME TARGETS: ie7 VISTA 8k, I know someone who will pay much for up
to 75 for the same."
Hell that sentence doesn't even make any sense! Wha
Roman and List,
Let me address this issue once and for all, because the "issue" is
really quite simple. I am offering security researchers the ability to have
their exploits legally purchased for a price that is higher than the
standard prices offered by the majority of third parties. The rese
Sure he did ivan...
On 1/19/07 12:53 AM, "Ivan ." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 75.000 for a remote vista ie7 xploit,
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secun
SAME TARGETS: ie7 VISTA 8k, I know someone who will pay much for up
to 75 for the same. YOUR WORDS FUCKFACE
ST00PID LYING CUNT!
"I can arrange the legitimate purchase of most
working exploits for significantly more money than iDefense, In
some cases
over $75,000.00 per purchase."
""
Nobody ever said that 75,000.00 was a price for a remote vista bug.
On 1/18/07 8:39 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This is complete bullshit nothing more than a social engineering
> honey pot to get bugs and vulns for their own use, this company
> couldn't affort 75.ooo USD
How do you know the vuln won't be re-sold?
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
This is complete bullshit nothing more than a social engineering
honey pot to get bugs and vulns for their own use, this company
couldn't affort 75.ooo USD if they tried, they cannot even find
their own bugs, they got 4 or 5 shitty "reasearch and vuln"
findings of thier own, that's it.
75.000
Then you cannot assure that your buyer will make an ethical use of the
exploit. So what's the real difference against selling it to another people
(known or "unknown", where "unknown" could be black-hats, script-kiddies or
whoever making the higher bid)? The receipt? :) I mean, if I (as a
researche
Just wanted to let everyone know that I've updated the blog to reflect new
changes. You can see the changes at http://snosoft.blogspot.com.
On 1/18/07 2:27 PM, "Simon Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh,
> About your ROI question, that varies per buyer. I am not usually told
> about why
Oh,
About your ROI question, that varies per buyer. I am not usually told
about why a buyer needs something as that's none of my business.
On 1/18/07 4:22 AM, "Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Simon Smith escribió:
>> Amen!
>> KF is 100% on the money. I can arra
Roman,
It depends on the needs and requirements of the buyer.
On 1/18/07 4:22 AM, "Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Simon Smith escribió:
>> Amen!
>> KF is 100% on the money. I can arrange the legitimate purchase of most
>> working exploits for significantly mor
Simon Smith escribió:
> Amen!
> KF is 100% on the money. I can arrange the legitimate purchase of most
> working exploits for significantly more money than iDefense, In some cases
> over $75,000.00 per purchase. The company that I am working with has a
> relationship with a legitimate buyer, al
Amen!
KF is 100% on the money. I can arrange the legitimate purchase of most
working exploits for significantly more money than iDefense, In some cases
over $75,000.00 per purchase. The company that I am working with has a
relationship with a legitimate buyer, all transactions are legal. If you
22 matches
Mail list logo
