On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:04:42 EST, Dude VanWinkle said:
Anyone who was a security expert 30 yrs ago should be ridiculed. Their
job description was I inspect all 5 1/4 disks that get mailed to
us and should be a reason NOT to hire them :-P
Anybody who doesn't know the history of security well
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of happy ninoSent:
Sunday, December 02, 2007 3:42 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[Full-disclosure] need help in managing administrators
Hi All,i've a problem in my organization that we have several domain admins, we
are in the process of removing
All that time and you still fail it at the internet?
Sheesh.
:)
On Dec 5, 2007 5:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:04:42 EST, Dude VanWinkle said:
Anyone who was a security expert 30 yrs ago should be ridiculed. Their
job description was I inspect all 5 1/4 disks
On Dec 5, 2007 5:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:04:42 EST, Dude VanWinkle said:
Anyone who was a security expert 30 yrs ago should be ridiculed. Their
job description was I inspect all 5 1/4 disks that get mailed to
us and should be a reason NOT to hire them :-P
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:45:39 EST, Dude VanWinkle said:
You are right, thanks for all the careful planning and well thought
out infrastructure. I mean, who could have thought that the ability to
reach into the homes of every tom dick and harry as well as every
company on the planet would be
On Dec 5, 2007 11:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:45:39 EST, Dude VanWinkle said:
You are right, thanks for all the careful planning and well thought
out infrastructure. I mean, who could have thought that the ability to
reach into the homes of every tom dick and
On Dec 6, 2007 1:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 23:57:19 EST, Dude VanWinkle said:
try this hey boss, you will cause regulation, expose national secrets
to commies,
Umm.. hate to break it to you, but the design was for an *open* research
network. If you said you'd be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snippety, snip
Or you could go the EEPROM/CDROM route like most game consoles did. That's
easier on the practicality side, but still isn't as flexible as a
general-purpose PC.
Which, of course, raises the question _today_, do _most_ computer users
for _all_ their
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:36:30 +1300, Nick FitzGerald said:
likelihood of those problems being permanently addressed, why were
these issues not addressed at some point when the cost/performance
points started to be more favourable?
Because when the price/performance shifted to make lots of
I guess there's only one real alternative to this terrible circle of
doom then: stop feeding in to the man's machine and become a blackhat
and stop disclosing.
*waits for Valdis to hand in his hat authorization to use FD.
On Dec 6, 2007 2:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007
On Dec 2, 2007 8:46 PM, T Biehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wonderous suggestion Dude.
Apparently someone can't spot obvious sarcasm.
I do have a deficiency in that area.. or are you being sarcastic again?
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hi All,i've a problem in my organization that we have several domain admins, we
are in the process of removing most of them but i need to have a person only
authorized to installnew software to users' computers but without having access
to other parts of the users machines, is this possible
In short, this depends on the permissions needed / how the installer
determines if the user has them. The easiest thing to do is to give
local administrator access (I'm assuming Windows platform because it
sounds like it), if this is not permissible to you (as local admin
access can easily be
Why are you removing the admins? based on what you wrote the computer
network will probably turn into a massive mess with all these programs
installed and users as admins..
On Dec 2, 2007 8:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 09:42:26 GMT, happy nino said:
Hi All,i've a
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 09:42:26 GMT, happy nino said:
Hi All,i've a problem in my organization that we have several domain admins,
we are in the process of removing most of them but i need to have a person
only authorized to installnew software to users' computers but without having
access to
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:34:01 +0100, James Matthews said:
Why are you removing the admins? based on what you wrote the computer
network will probably turn into a massive mess with all these programs
installed and users as admins..
Actually, my first guess is that Happy Nino is trying to *clean
Clearly stated, he was cleaning up DOMAIN Administrators, which can,
you know, Administer all the computers on the domain.
*Obviously*
I guess we'll all just denounce our friend here for even thinking he
could ask a question as STUPID and RIDICULOUS as this one, instead of
actually knowing or
Forgot to address one part of the question in my response:
Q: new software to users' computers but without having access to other
parts of the users machines, is this possible ?
A: Yes, this is easy, use EFS set security perms so that the
installer can't access the files. Remember to generate
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 15:32:22 EST, T Biehn said:
Clearly stated, he was cleaning up DOMAIN Administrators, which can,
you know, Administer all the computers on the domain.
What, you don't think that some people are unfortunate enough to be newcomers
to the field, and their first assignment is to
On Dec 2, 2007 4:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 15:32:22 EST, T Biehn said:
Clearly stated, he was cleaning up DOMAIN Administrators, which can,
you know, Administer all the computers on the domain.
What, you don't think that some people are unfortunate enough to be
Wonderous suggestion Dude.
Apparently someone can't spot obvious sarcasm.
On Dec 2, 2007 8:04 PM, Dude VanWinkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007 4:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 15:32:22 EST, T Biehn said:
Clearly stated, he was cleaning up DOMAIN
21 matches
Mail list logo
