> FD is monitored by every major LEA in the world. Posting here is a
> good way to notify all of them at once.
So, by your argument, I should send every spam, the first time I see
it, to full-disclosure. I'm sure that will be particularly useful.
>
> Please drop this now. Posting the fulltext
Hi James.
Spam may be part of our lives, but to roll over and accept it is not
really the best approach. Fight back.
-- bob
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, James Matthews wrote:
> Spam is a part of our lives
>
> On Nov 8, 2007 1:34 PM, lsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
4. Analysis of
Spam is a part of our lives
On Nov 8, 2007 1:34 PM, lsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 4. Analysis of spam for the benefit of the group.
> >
> > You have made a logical leap that I do not follow. How does it
> > benefit the group?
>
> Some people have issues reading the signs, particularly the
> > 4. Analysis of spam for the benefit of the group.
>
> You have made a logical leap that I do not follow. How does it
> benefit the group?
Some people have issues reading the signs, particularly the Received:
lines. I only did this after you requested additional analysis,
however.
> > 6.
> > Actually, it would hurt my wallet, and waste my time, compounding the
> > loss
> > already incurred by receiving the spam in the first place.
>
> But it's worth your time to forward spam to everyone on the
Simply put, it's evidence of a crime. The mail was forwarded in its
entirety to provid
On 11/2/07, lsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Actually, it would hurt my wallet, and waste my time, compounding the
> > > loss
> > > already incurred by receiving the spam in the first place.
> >
> > But it's worth your time to forward spam to everyone on the
>
> Simply put, it's evidence of a c
> Actually, it would hurt my wallet, and waste my time, compounding the
> loss
> already incurred by receiving the spam in the first place.
But it's worth your time to forward spam to everyone on the
full-disclosure mailing list.
> > Also, if you really believed that it might come from his campai
t certainly newsworthy if so. All of these unlikelies got me
> > curious...
> >
> > Stu
> >
> > On 28 Oct 2007 at 12:04, Aaron Katz wrote:
> >
> > Date sent: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:04:13 -0400
> > From: "Aaron Katz" <[EMAIL P
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 03:00:25AM -, lsi wrote:
> I didn't do much in the way of research, cos this is surely spam, and
> we know spammers forge as much as possible.
[..snipped insiteful analysis..]
I would add that I doubt very much a politician would send out a newsletter
with such lousy
ECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] spammer wades into US
Presidential race
Copies to: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
> Could you provide a little more information/investigation (I'm too
> lazy, at this ver
Stu
>
> On 28 Oct 2007 at 12:04, Aaron Katz wrote:
>
> Date sent: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:04:13 -0400
> From: "Aaron Katz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:Re: [Full-disclosure] sp
On 10/29/07, Leif Ericksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Either way they are doing it to advance their own agenda.
>
> bottom line that is what their lack of action is all about. Their own
> agenda.
I think his "agenda" was to make the guys who support the war actually
go on record as supporting t
Is this a political science list or an information security list? ;) I
mean, I'm all for a debate about the inherent war powers of the President,
or the War Powers Act in specific, but I'm not sure that's really the point
here. ;)
On 10/29/07, Leif Ericksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Either w
Either way they are doing it to advance their own agenda.
bottom line that is what their lack of action is all about. Their own
agenda.
--
Leif Ericksen
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 12:03 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:35:04 CDT, Leif Ericksen said:
>
> > Yes the president c
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:35:04 CDT, Leif Ericksen said:
> Yes the president can send the troops to war.
> Congress is needed to declare war (the president can not do it)
> See the following:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_war_by_the_United_States
>
> After World War II, Congress volu
Another thing that is laughable is this person Ron Paul is said to once
elected stop the war in Iraq. OK just how does ONE (1) person plan do
do that? I love the fact that people want to blame Mr President for the
war in Iraq. But that is not my understanding of U.S. Government
operations.
Yes
A vote for ron paul is a vote for al qaeda
On 10/28/07, lsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Well, it could be worse. Spam that wants to end the Iraq war,
> great! - Stu]
>
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from 195.247.52.59.broad.nc.jx.dynamic.163data.com.cn
> (195.247.52.59.broad.nc.
Could you provide a little more information/investigation (I'm too
lazy, at this very moment, to do the background investigation that you
should have provided, like who derk gaston is)? According to the
headers, this looks like it might be forged (not just the little "may
be forged" notice, but th
[Well, it could be worse. Spam that wants to end the Iraq war,
great! - Stu]
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 195.247.52.59.broad.nc.jx.dynamic.163data.com.cn
(195.247.52.59.broad.nc.jx.dynamic.163data.com.cn [59.52.247.195]
(may be forged))
19 matches
Mail list logo
