RE: [Full-disclosure] Blocking Skype

2005-11-13 Thread Aditya Deshmukh
> Blocking Skype Using Squid and OpenBSD Hey I cant wait to try out this one - this is really intresting one. Very informative writeup. Thanks rootn0de Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.c

Re: [Full-disclosure] Blocking Skype

2005-11-14 Thread Kevin
On 11/13/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have had no problems at all with the above setup, and as a result, > only Skype is blocked, as most(if not all) companies serious about > having a web presence > have registered domains and hence are referenced by their FQDN URLs. This

Re: [Full-disclosure] Blocking Skype

2005-11-14 Thread Polarizer
> acl connect method CONNECT This line is not necessary since standard squid.conf contains this line: acl CONNECT method CONNECT so simply use the uppercase version (squid does not check upper and lower case in acl names) > # Apply your acls > http access deny connect numerics_IPs all Respe

Re: [Full-disclosure] Blocking Skype

2005-11-14 Thread Polarizer
No, the "connect" was certainly not a typo. But indeed the "http access" was. The 2nd typo was "numerics_IPs" instead of "numeric_IPs". I think, it is o.k. to show up such pitfalls. > BTW: I'm sure, it will break a lot of other things but skype, too. Do you mean "I'm sure it will break a lot

Re: [Full-disclosure] Blocking Skype

2005-11-14 Thread Andrew McGill
Polarizer wrote, > > acl connect method CONNECT > > This line is not necessary since standard squid.conf contains this line: > > acl CONNECT method CONNECT > > so simply use the uppercase version (squid does not check upper and lower case > in acl names) > > > # Apply your acls > > http access

Re: [Full-disclosure] Blocking Skype

2005-11-14 Thread Peter van den Heuvel
This line is not necessary since standard squid.conf contains this line: That has nothing to do with the proposed configuration. No serious squid implementation would have a standard ACL list, so every serious admin would rewrite them. And if you are serious you have some sort of convention for

Re: [Full-disclosure] Blocking Skype on ISP level

2005-04-04 Thread Jochen Kaiser
This can be achieved by using an IDP system and blocking the appropriate p2p protocol (I forgot which one. overnet?). An IDP is a device which works with signatures as known from IDS-Systems and instead of reporting malicious activity it blocks packets or connections. Therefore it must be placed i

Re: [Full-disclosure] Blocking Skype on ISP level

2005-04-04 Thread Florian Weimer
* Jochen Kaiser: > This can be achieved by using an IDP system and blocking the > appropriate p2p protocol (I forgot which one. overnet?). > An IDP is a device which works with signatures as known from > IDS-Systems and instead of reporting malicious activity > it blocks packets or connections. T

Re: [Full-disclosure] Blocking Skype on ISP level

2005-04-04 Thread Ake Nordin
At 13:00 2005-04-04, Jochen Kaiser scribed thusly: >This can be achieved by using an IDP system and blocking the >appropriate p2p protocol (I forgot which one. overnet?). >So as an ISP who shall grant best quality for all customers the >usage of a software based IDP may not be the appropriate w