Re: [Full-disclosure] IIS hacking contest

2005-04-08 Thread n3td3v
On Apr 9, 2005 12:16 AM, sHz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know how Windows IT pro magazine even came up with this silly > idea. Everyone (almost) knows that nothing remains impenetrable for > long! Not only that, but these contests give certain people > (managers/some admins) a false sense

Re: [Full-disclosure] IIS hacking contest

2005-04-08 Thread sHz
I don't know how Windows IT pro magazine even came up with this silly idea. Everyone (almost) knows that nothing remains impenetrable for long! Not only that, but these contests give certain people (managers/some admins) a false sense of security. Then again, I want to see the box hacked to shreds

Re: [Full-disclosure] IIS hacking contest

2005-04-07 Thread H D Moore
Marc, I will buy you *two* Xbox's for a nice IIS 6.0 remote :-) Seriously, the "market value" of a remote exploit for IIS 6.0 is somewhere between two and twenty thousand dollars, depending on how shady you want to get. These "find some 0day and give it to us" challenges are a waste of a time

RE: [Full-disclosure] IIS hacking contest

2005-04-07 Thread Marc Maiffret
Has no one learned from these contests yet that they don't work, not even for reasons of being a false way to test security, but because the servers are never able to stay online for more than an hour because of denial of service attacks. The "funny" part is if the server gets DDoS'd then so will

Re: [Full-disclosure] IIS hacking contest

2005-04-07 Thread Randall Perry
But that's not quite real world. Is the server running SQL server? Oracle? Or is it just serving static pages and is sitting behind a reverse proxy [on FreeBSD]. There aren't any details there. Suppose no one cracks the box, that just means someone didn't want to spill their guts for a retail Xb