>: Well done, anyone else who knows of people committing fraud against isc2
>: should report them. Unfortunately I don't think its feasible for isc2 to
>: check everybody.
>Oh, how coincidental..
What do you suggest? that they check everyone who passes the exam?
>Ethics Complaint Procedures [0]
>>I swore an oath never again to apply my skills in a way that helps
Microsoft.
So that means.. no forensics that show it actually was the user downloading
porn instead of the OS being exploited?
Geo.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I respect your right to have an opinion, however I do not respect the
fact that your opinion completely sucks ass. I meen seriously man, when
has MS really become that bad?
TBH as long as the kernel I'm running can reliably schedule processes
and allocate memor
: Well done, anyone else who knows of people committing fraud against isc2
: should report them. Unfortunately I don't think its feasible for isc2 to
: check everybody.
Oh, how coincidental..
: They do random credential checking and I should I know, since I was
: audited after I passed the ex
Hi J.A.
Well done, anyone else who knows of people committing fraud against
isc2 should report them. Unfortunately I don't think its feasible for
isc2 to check everybody.
They do random credential checking and I should I know, since I was
audited after I passed the exam.
The CISSP cert is the b
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, DAN MORRILL wrote:
> Anyone have any statistics they can share on how many people get their CISSP
> revoked due to ethical issues?
I have first hand personal knowledge of 2 CISSPs who were brought to the
attention of ISC2 for (a) forging a college diploma, and (b) participat
I respect your right to have an opinion, however I do not respect the fact that your opinion completely sucks ass. I meen seriously man, when has MS really become that bad? So much more people run Windows than who run Linux and you know it's true, and it's never going to change. There is not
will indicate that the mesasge failed to be delivered.
Please resend when you get those, it does not mean that the mail box is bad,
merely that MSN mail is over worked at the time.
From: Jeremy Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclos
On Thursday 18 August 2005 11:31, DAN MORRILL wrote:
> community at large. So who's ethics do we apply, if I was to follow
> the CISSP code of ethics, in that consorting with non-professionals,
> would mean that I could not teach information security in college
> (which I do), nor could I teach wh
Do we get to swear a sacred oath never to use our skills in support of
Microsoft?
Can we work a secret handshake into that, too?
On 8/18/05, DAN MORRILL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good afternoon folks,
>...
> So what we need is a universal code of ethics that everyone could agree on
> (herding
--On Thursday, August 18, 2005 17:31:24 + Jason Coombs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I swore an oath never again to apply my skills in a way that helps
Microsoft.
So..when do you move in with Georgi?
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Adjunct Information Security Officer
University of Texa
l-Disclosure
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: MS not telling enough
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:12:57 -0300
On 8/18/05, Jason Coombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So there ya go. I suppose you'll
> > find something new to complain
> > about, or to be rude about.
>
&
On 8/18/05, Jason Coombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So there ya go. I suppose you'll
> > find something new to complain
> > about, or to be rude about.
>
> Whenever possible, yes.
>
> It's amazing how much you support Microsoft. Don't you know that it is in the
> continued support that you g
Whoa, dude.
Did that involve a midnight ritual & the sacrifice of a small animal?
On 8/18/05, Jason Coombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I swore an oath never again to apply my skills in a way that helps Microsoft.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it
14 matches
Mail list logo
