Seeing how my question was ignored. I will tell you the answer.
There is no requirement in SOX to do this.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://se
> Seeing how my question was ignored. I will tell you the answer.
>
> There is no requirement in SOX to do this.
Why cant you use google to find out this ?
---
http://www.nonprofitrisk.org/nwsltr/archive/employprac091005-p.htm
*In
> Why cant you use google to find out this ?
The same reason you can't use Google and find your answer fuckbag.
> *In the para 4*
> "Protecting whistleblowers is an essential component of an ethical
> and open work environment."
No mention of an anon email address here.
> *In para 6* <- th
IANAL, But IMO use an Intranet web page that allows employees to submit
anonymous html post to the web server via html. Now if your security
policy is pervasive then surely auditing is enabled on all your systems,
thus removing any anonymity this would have provided. Have you
considered, dare I s
;" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:36:10 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from lists.grok.org.uk ([195.184.125.51]) by
bay0-mc7-f4.bay0.hotmail.com with Micros
Google "sox whistleblowers" = hard work
But let me help you,
http://www.whistleblowers.org/html/sox_whistleblower_statute.htm
jeff Wilder wrote:
>Can some please send me the actual regulation that states or validates
the comments of
>http://www.nonprofitrisk.org/nwsltr/archive/employprac0910
See below marc email part
>> Aditya Deshmukh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>If you read the last line in para 6 you will find that anon
>> mailbox is
>> a requirement for SOX compliance.
>>
>> >And mailbox was ment for email Michael :)
>>
>> >But I think that "with a post and some concrete" ma
>
> > Why cant you use google to find out this ?
>
> The same reason you can't use Google and find your answer fuckbag.
Are you n3td3v ?
>
> > *In the para 4*
> > "Protecting whistleblowers is an essential component of an ethical
> > and open work environment."
>
> No mention of an anon emai
And if you had used Google in the first place shitbreath, You would
not have written your original email.
Oh and I am not n3td3v. My morning shits are smarter than n3td3v and
contain more intelligence.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: h
On 12/2/05, Aditya Deshmukh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Why cant you use google to find out this ?>> The same reason you can't use Google and find your answer fuckbag.
Are you n3td3v ?In the spirit of full-disclosure I support anyone's [doesn't matter if
it is a troll like infosecbofh or netde
10 matches
Mail list logo
