On 15/02/2011 16:55, Michele Orru wrote:
> 2011/2/14 MustLive:
>> Hello Michele!
>>
>> Few days ago I saw your advisory about Drupal's captcha. It's interesting
>> advisory, but I have one note concerning it - your research is very close to
>> mine ;-) (it concerns similar holes which I found befor
Some guys pay more for women with "extra hardware". What are you doing
later? ;-)
> What the hell :)
> I'm a man mate.
>
> Michele is like Michael.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Eyeballing Weev
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:54 PM, MustLive
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Michele!
>>
>> Few days ago I saw your advisory about Drupal's captcha. It's interesting
>> advisory, but I have one note concerning it - your research is very close
>> to
2011/2/14 MustLive :
> Hello Michele!
>
> Few days ago I saw your advisory about Drupal's captcha. It's interesting
> advisory, but I have one note concerning it - your research is very close to
> mine ;-) (it concerns similar holes which I found before you).
I didn't found anything in FD or other
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:54 PM, MustLive wrote:
> Hello Michele!
>
> Few days ago I saw your advisory about Drupal's captcha. It's interesting
> advisory, but I have one note concerning it - your research is very close
> to
> mine ;-) (it concerns similar holes which I found before you).
>
Quit
Hello Michele!
Few days ago I saw your advisory about Drupal's captcha. It's interesting
advisory, but I have one note concerning it - your research is very close to
mine ;-) (it concerns similar holes which I found before you).
First, you are talking Drupal captcha and saying that Drupal <= 6.20
