\x80j\x01\x03\x01
but how can j be in there is what i dont get *shrug*
hint: the ascii-value for j is 0x6a. since j is a valid letter
there is no need to write it in hex. see google.com and intel.com for
further information about this issue ... ;)
- w.
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -=[
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 01:57, Nick FitzGerald wrote:
Try to read Microsoft's latest security epistles:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-009.mspx
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-010.mspx
with a browser that does not have JavaScript
S-Quadra Advisory #2004-03-12
Topic: Dogpatch Software CFWebstore 5.0 shopping cart software multiple
security vulnerabilities
Severity: High
Vendor URL: http://www.cfwebstore.com
Advisory URL: http://www.s-quadra.com/advisories/Adv-20040312.txt
Release date: 12 Mar 2004
1. DESCRIPTION
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 462-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
March 12th, 2004
Friday, March 12, 2004
Having a firm belief in unnecessary gadgetry, we recently sent
our most senior colleague Liu Die Yu a request to update his
contact information via our plaxo device
[http://www.plaxo.com/]. Checking back several hours later in
our plaxo web account we eagerly selected
Dear List,
Drunken junkie brad spengler has triumphantly released 2.6 version of his revolutionary
backdoored kernel patch grsecurity PRODUCT. We are talking next generation here,
among the
added features:
Tab completion
3d games support
IRC client support
GAIM support
Experimental
:no
Affected Releases: Affected Packages: Corrected Packages:
OpenPKG CURRENT = uudeview-0.5.20-20040302 = uudeview-0.5.20-20040312
OpenPKG 2.0 = uudeview-0.5.19-2.0.0= uudeview-0.5.19-2.0.1
OpenPKG 1.3 = uudeview-0.5.18-1.3.0= uudeview-0.5.18-1.3.1
Dependent
It would probably be better to build it at the switch level. I would think
there would be a change in resistance when there is ANYTHING added/removed
from the cabling that could be measured by the switch. You could then have
it disable that segment upon such detection if you'd like.
-jb
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:38:02 -0800 VeNoMouS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
any one know if theres a new exploit for apache 1.3.29 in the wild
one of my mates boxes was breached this morning by ir4dex appears
they gained axx via apache then got root via mmap()
Only one I have seen is for Apache for
Even worse ! Convinced we could out-wit Nick FitzGerald ;-) we
see with glee tucked away at the bottom of the page:
View a printer-friendly version of this page
PRESTO ! Away we go.
Only to find that 3 colorful pages later, our trusty printer
churns pictures of the
[x]technical details
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/357064/2004-03-08/2004-03-14/2
http://forums.cpanel.net/showthread.php?s=threadid=21456
RK Davies
Textbox Networks
http://www.textbox.net
**
This post is encrypted in the english language
Coworker of mine took a class taught by one of the authors of this book:
http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0764544683.html
Coworker is telling me this is some sort of compendium of unreleased
exploits. Figuring that the average exploit would take up about 5 pages
of printed
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:09:21 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your points are well taken and understandable. But if you are supporting
a M$ operating system enough to need to read the SB's, then wouldnt your
IE be up to date to read them? Even if you would just use IE to read M$'s
site?
Anyone know for sure? I've never heard of any of these guys, but one of
these jokers has to be on this mailing list.
You've never heard of David Litchfield, Dave Aitel or Riley Hassell? You
need to hit the bars at Blackhat instead of the talks meng.
[d]
At 02:46 PM 3/12/2004 -0800, david cohen wrote:
I've never heard of any of these guys, but one of
these jokers has to be on this mailing list.
You're kidding, right? You've never heard of
David Litchfield or Dave Aitel? Check the
archives, or google them.
m5x
here is something i found on dave aitel using that google search engine
thing..
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=birth+of+a+gay+sluthl=enlr=ie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8selm=544eli%249704151525%40qz.little-neck.ny.usrnum=1
--c0hiba
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, madsaxon wrote:
At 02:46 PM 3/12/2004 -0800, david
To save folks the time and effort;
The Shellcoder's
Handbook: Discovering and Exploiting Security Holes
Jack Koziol, David Litchfield, Dave Aitel, Chris Anley, Sinan noir
Eren, Neel Mehta, Riley Hassell
ISBN: 0-7645-4468-3
Paperback
648 pages
March 22, 2004
* Examines
c0hiba wrote:
here is something i found on dave aitel using that google search engine
thing..
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=birth+of+a+gay+sluthl=enlr=ie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8selm=544eli%249704151525%40qz.little-neck.ny.usrnum=1
--c0hiba
Interesting, you posted this same link to FD four
Hey,
Can anybody tell me how to change computer IP through DOS ? i am using
windowsXP. please tell me its command thanks.
Best Regards,
Farrukh Hussain.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
They think we are morons too!!
Just in case you don't know how to read and have somehow found yourself
working on security with MS products, you can listen to a CISSP (they
are trained and certified readers) read the security bulletins to you as
well as promote whatever crap they feel like
Can anybody tell me how to change computer IP through DOS ? i am
using windowsXP. please tell me its command thanks.
http://www.nthelp.com/w2k3/to_add_a_bunch_of_ip_addresses.htm
Geo.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
ipconfig cannot be used to change an ip. RTFQ d00d.
Farrukh,
Try googling for (change ip command line windows xp)
Or explore the netsh command.
--S
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Downs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12,
Hi its John,
Here are the commands to change computer IP through DOS .
Go to command Prompt and type
netsh
interface
ip
set address local static 10.0.0.1 255.0.0.0
Thts it. Farrukh Hussain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,Can anybody tell me how to change computer IP through DOS ? i am using
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Troy wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:09:21 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your points are well taken and understandable. But if you are supporting
a M$ operating system enough to need to read the SB's, then wouldnt your
IE be up to date to read them? Even if
Hi,
Thanks it works :) . And the reason was, i was learning DOS :) thats why i asked
:) bye bye ta ta . and thanks again.
John Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi its John,
Here are the commands to change computer IP through DOS .
Go to command Prompt and type
netsh
interface
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 05:57, Nick FitzGerald wrote:
Try to read Microsoft's latest security epistles:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-009.mspx
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-010.mspx
with a browser that does not have JavaScript
MS is not alone. More and more web sites don't work without scripting
and/or cookies. I guess cookies are a lesser evil. I'm constantly faced
with the decision whether or not a particular content means enough to me
that I'll turn on the script. In fact, I now run two browsers, Mozilla with
Your points are well taken and understandable. But if you are supporting
a M$ operating system enough to need to read the SB's, then wouldnt your
IE be up to date to read them? Even if you would just use IE to read M$'s
site? To sit and scream about web design decisions in this mailing group
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to me:
Nothing personal against Jim in particular here -- I've received a
couple of direct Email responses that suggest a few others may also
have had trouble grasping the _irony_ I was pointing out...
That dealt with, I'll now address the peripheral security issues Jim
29 matches
Mail list logo
