On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Gary Flynn wrote:
> Byron Copeland wrote:
>
> >True. And tell me you can get 7.0 to scan anything without problems?
> >
> >
> I've been holding off on 7 because 6.x has been working fine but was
> planning on upgrading soon. Want to share problems you've seen
> with 7?
I've
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 22:50:13 -0400, Steve Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But that [outlook] entails paying
> BIG BUCKS to some
> large monopoly
I wasn't implying that Outlook was the only way to go. I was just saying
that even Outlook doesn't have the problem. OE is the only client I've
seen
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 13:44:51 +0100, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes, because you don't use outlook ;)
True, though I am pretty much forced to use Outlook at work, and I
noticed that it also treats *just* the signature as an attachment. So,
it seems limited to Outlook Express. A quick
Just curious,
I wonder how many Real Secure sensors out there are being rebuilt right
now?
--
"Save yourself from the 'Gates' of hell, use Linux." -- The_Kind @
LinuxNet
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--On Sunday, March 21, 2004 9:51 PM -0500 Gary Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
A scanner is not a server although I've been tempted. :)
I'd argue that an enterprise scanning solution *should* be on a server, and
a well secured one at that.
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Adjunct Information S
Byron Copeland wrote:
True. And tell me you can get 7.0 to scan anything without problems?
I've been holding off on 7 because 6.x has been working fine but was
planning on upgrading soon. Want to share problems you've seen
with 7?
___
Full-Disclosu
Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Monday, March 22, 2004 1:49 AM +0100 Niek Baakman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Burton M. Strauss III wrote:
That "Technical Preview" is a Release Candidate, which they suggest you
NOT apply to production servers.
-Burton
Last time I checked XP isn't a server OS :)
Te
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 20:40, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Monday, March 22, 2004 1:49 AM +0100 Niek Baakman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Burton M. Strauss III wrote:
> >
> >> That "Technical Preview" is a Release Candidate, which they suggest you
> >> NOT apply to production servers.
> >>
> >
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:49:29AM +0100, Cedric Blancher wrote:
Le dim 21/03/2004 à 02:04, Jim Richardson a écrit :
>Keylogger ?
Installed how?
With the worm...
Where? /home is mounted noexec.
--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
"You have grown old in the fine art of bastardy
--On Monday, March 22, 2004 1:49 AM +0100 Niek Baakman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Burton M. Strauss III wrote:
That "Technical Preview" is a Release Candidate, which they suggest you
NOT apply to production servers.
-Burton
Last time I checked XP isn't a server OS :)
Tell ISS that. They *r
Burton M. Strauss III wrote:
That "Technical Preview" is a Release Candidate, which they suggest you NOT
apply to production servers.
-Burton
Last time I checked XP isn't a server OS :)
Regards,
Niek
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 21 March 2004 18:54, Frank Knobbe wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 19:41, Max Valdez wrote:
> > > Keylogger ?
> >
> > Intelligent enoght to know wish keystrokes are passphrase ??
>
> Nah, keyloggers don't have to be intelligent, they just have
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 16:18, Matthew Murphy wrote:
> "Hugh Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >3. If someone can trace the origin of this worm, it might shed light on
> the
> > >origin of SQL Slammer as well?
> >
> > Definitely a big NO.
>
> Indeed this does appear to be accurate. While it loo
"Hugh Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >3. If someone can trace the origin of this worm, it might shed light on
the
> >origin of SQL Slammer as well?
>
> Definitely a big NO.
Indeed this does appear to be accurate. While it looks as though the worm
is technically similar to Slammer, think abou
>On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 19:41, Max Valdez wrote:
>> > Keylogger ?
>> Intelligent enoght to know wish keystrokes are passphrase ??
>Nah, keyloggers don't have to be intelligent, they just have to log
>data. It is *you* that needs to be intelligent when reviewing the
>captured key strokes.
I woul
On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 19:41, Max Valdez wrote:
> > Keylogger ?
> Intelligent enoght to know wish keystrokes are passphrase ??
Nah, keyloggers don't have to be intelligent, they just have to log
data. It is *you* that needs to be intelligent when reviewing the
captured key strokes.
Examples:
1)
Not necessarily...
My fully registered and activated copy of Office Professional Enterprise
2003 was given to me free by M$all I had to do was register for their
Office System 2003 event...had to listen to a M$ rep ramble for 8 hours
about the Office System but hey I figure I can give them 8 h
From: "Disclosure From OSSI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From the quick analysis of this worm (retrieved from
http://isc.incidents.org/diary.html?date=2004-03-20), it seems that it
bears
strange similarity with SQL Slammer for the following points:
1. It uses the same "push ascii" format as SQL Slam
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:05:11AM -0500, Luke Scharf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > But that [outlook] entails paying
> > BIG BUCKS to some
> > large monopoly
> >
> > many persons find that repugnant
>
> You already paid big bucks to that monopoly for Outlook Express. The
> cost was just hidden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 20 March 2004 19:16, Bill Royds wrote:
> So the value of signing your messages doesn't really scale.
> That is why S/MIME is used by most commercial MUA's. Even though you have
> to pay for the certificate, you can pretty well guarantee th
On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 21:50, Steve Menard wrote:
> Troy wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:27:56 +0100, "Frank de Wit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >If you were to switch email clients, you wouldn't have this problem.
> >Even if you went to Outlook, you could read their messages without
> >ope
That "Technical Preview" is a Release Candidate, which they suggest you NOT
apply to production servers.
-Burton
> -Original Message-
> From: Gadi Evron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 5:49 PM
> To: Windows NTBugtraq Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAI
On Saturday 20 March 2004 6:27 pm, Cedric Blancher wrote:
> Le dim 21/03/2004 à 00:33, Jim Richardson a écrit :
> > I would be interested to see how it would accomplish that.
>
> Keylogger ?
Intelligent enoght to know wish keystrokes are passphrase ??
If that can be doable, why not be able to del
Hello Troy,
* Troy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-21 12:24]:
> > if many people here have the same problem i will not sign my mails in
> > the future to this mailinglist in the hope that all can read my mails.
> > regards nico
>
> FYI, with my mailer, your emails show up as plain text message with
Le dim 21/03/2004 à 02:41, Max Valdez a écrit :
> > Keylogger ?
> Intelligent enoght to know wish keystrokes are passphrase ??
Good point, if we consider the worm to be autonomous.
But a worm may be a wonderful information gathering tool for someone
that is able to extract strings that could be
Hello Daniele,
I'm catching up on email and saw this -- are you (or anyone else
here) familiar with the notify protocol running under the fat-client
verison of Groupwise? If so can you email me off list .. I want to
know if there's a way around the UDP->TCP flip that it does mid-
stream (can
Le dim 21/03/2004 à 02:04, Jim Richardson a écrit :
> >Keylogger ?
> Installed how?
With the worm...
--
http://www.netexit.com/~sid/
PGP KeyID: 157E98EE FingerPrint: FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE
>> Hi! I'm your friendly neighbourhood signature virus.
>> Copy me to your signature fil
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OTOH, I learned the theory behind the design of the various systems that
> comprise an automobile and got some hands on experience rebuilding
> engines in high school auto shop. While I do not pretend to have the
> working skills and knowledge to act
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
29 matches
Mail list logo
