Bennett Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] felt compelled to burble:
If you want to really enjoy the pleasure of idiot false-positives
from weak virus-scanners, just use this as your .sig, or better yet
bodge it into a header:
[EMAIL PROTECTED](P^)7CC)7}\$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!\$H+H*
It's God's fault for putting the apple in the garden It's been downhill
ever since. :)
Well, since you brought it up, last time I checked God did not swist the
arm of Adam or Eve to eat the apple, so how could that be God's fault?
Man is the one that chooses to do the good thing
Heya --
Quoth Honza Vlach (Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 10:40:12AM +0100):
2004-03-22 09:01:37.781326500 Failed keyboard-interactive for illegal
user xjunr01 from :::212.65.252.97 port 61991 ssh2
2004-03-22 09:01:37.781379500 Disconnecting: Too many authentication
failures for xjunr01
2004-03-22
~~~
Application:Yahoo Mail!
Vendors: http://www.yahoo.com
Platforms:WebMail
Bug: Cross Site Scripting
Risk: High - Stealing Accounts
Exploitation:Remote with browser
Date:
At 24.03.2004 17:50 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi people
i'm looking for a very simple,reliable, small (certainly less the 1mb),
must-have gui, windows, stenographic encryption program. i'd appreciate
any recommendations.
What you are looking for is steganography I guess
I suggest having a
This has been something I've wondered about for a while, its a good idea for
e-mails to carry some kind of passed tag from AV systems only if it
actually means something. Which as just a plain text, easily duplicatable
signature it doesn't in-fact as recent Netsky variants are busy proving its
Andrew Aris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has been something I've wondered about for a while, its a good idea for
e-mails to carry some kind of passed tag from AV systems only if it
actually means something. Which as just a plain text, easily duplicatable
signature it doesn't in-fact as
~~~
Software: WinAmp
Vendor: NullSoft
http://www.nullsoft.com
http://www.winamp.com
Versions: =5.01
Platforms: Windows
Bug:Multiple
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 05:15:08AM +0200, Gadi Evron wrote:
I quite understand how this is possible, I simply don't see why this
content which is clearly:
1. Mis-leading.
B. Nothing but harmful.
C. Not in accordance with the list charter.
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have completed an analysis of the 'Witty' worm that impacts multiple ISS
products. The worm is spreading via a very simple UDP propagation
algorithm. The unique nature of this worm made it a fascinating piece of
code to analyze. The analysis gets
This virus sent to the list shows the problem of complete lack of
moderation. What would be best is a filter that does a virus scan and WARNS
about possible virus, but does not block anything. You would still be
responsible for personal digital hygiene, but would have a flag to filter
on.
Here
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Maarten wrote:
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 13:34, Gadi Evron wrote:
As I got a response from the managers, I am happy. And I took it off-list.
I left this thread alone for a long time, partly since what I felt was already
being said by others, and also partly because I
Brandon,
Check out TLS/SSL for your Exchange server...it's built in and all you need
is to install a couple certs and away you go. This encrypts server to
server email, so the server on the other side must support STARTTLS as well.
James
-Original Message-
From: Fetch, Brandon
Brandon, we use Mozilla, and it's S/MIME features. You can get free
personal certs from thawte.com. Also, we use postfix for our mailserver,
and have enabled TLS, where available (from client to server, and
sometimes from server to server) the SMTP traffic is encrypted. The
remote server must
This has been something I've wondered about for a while, its a good
idea for e-mails to carry some kind of passed tag from AV systems
only if it actually means something. Which as just a plain text,
easily duplicatable signature it doesn't in-fact as recent Netsky
variants are busy
How many times has this been discussed on the list? Such alteration
of messages send is in itself a form of moderation. even if you don't
remove the virus itself. Something the list charter clearly states
it will not do. Besides, why would the FD owners want to spend money (cpu
power required
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As this email discusses me, I'll reply, inline, to what I must.
| And in a private email to Mr. Evron I pointed out how it was nice of him
| to be willing to be a moderator.
There are already moderators to this mailing list.
| Mr. Evron's reply was
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 17:26:36 EST, Jason Freidman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The frequency of these compared to regular virus emails makes it seem that
some viruses actively target these type of addresses.
That's only because only 23 people or so had your e-mail address on their disks
(until you
Either don;t reply to rtf posts, or fix your MUA, again, ten lkines of
crap hides two lines of content;
@font-face { font-family: Tahoma; } @page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in;
margin: 1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; } P.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE: 12pt;
MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman }
text, the mailing list supports text, not html, not rtf, please, fix your
mailers, ten lines of trash to reach two lines of content?!;
@font-face { font-family: Tahoma; } @page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in;
margin: 1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; } P.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE: 12pt;
MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt;
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 17:56:09 MST, Epic [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Lately the SNR wouldn't allow for minimal communications if this were
any communications infrastructure.
You'd be amazed what Shannon lets you get away with.
http://seti.sentry.net/archive/bioastro/2000/0147.html
-178dBm. Yowza.
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:48:34 +0100, Aschwin Wesselius [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In my opinion the shout was towards Jesus in His multiple personality:
JESUS CHRIST (calling Him), SHUT THE FUCK UP (very demanding towards
the Lord) YOU GODDAM MORONS (talking in plural form, thus towards
more
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm looking for a very simple,reliable, small (certainly less
the 1mb),
must-have gui, windows, stenographic encryption program. i'd
appreciate
any recommendations.
There's a nice list at: http://www.jjtc.com/Steganography/toolmatrix.htm
Although steganography has
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi people
i'm looking for a very simple,reliable, small (certainly less the 1mb),
must-have gui, windows, stenographic encryption program. i'd appreciate
any recommendations.
thanks
xlop
If your gonna go to the trouble of using steg, do it right. Drop the GUI, get
a
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 200403-04
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
http://security.gentoo.org
- - - - -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
===-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-===
VizibleSoft Security Advisory #2004/01 25th Mar 2004
http://viziblesoft.com/insect/advisories/vz012004-esignal7.txt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following is an excerpt from a PivX statement which is worth quoting:
---
PivX Predictions Confirmed, Qwik-Fix Protected
Over the course of the last 2 years, PivX Solutions has warned the security
industry and the public about the possibility of automatically executing
email worms. This
I'd like to know how low the bit rate had to be to lock onto a signal that
low. :-) You can do incredible correlation tricks if you don't mind
waiting a long time for the data. In California they use GPS to measure
millimeter movements of the fault lines, but they signal correlate for
hours, if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
i'm looking for a very simple,reliable, small (certainly less
the 1mb),
must-have gui, windows, stenographic encryption program. i'd
appreciate
any recommendations.
There's a nice list at: http://www.jjtc.com/Steganography/toolmatrix.htm
Also, there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Netwosix Linux Security Advisory #2004-0006 http://www.netwosix.org
- ---
Package
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:50:45 EST, Ng, Kenneth (US) said:
I'd like to know how low the bit rate had to be to lock onto a signal that
low. :-)
I don't have a cite handy, but I believe it was on the order of 5 bits/second.
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
hi
thanks all of you who responded. i really appreciate the caring my
information recieved. thanks for the links. thread closed. i also wanted
to put my 2 cents in :whenever someone's emails someone off-the-list,
basicly just smalltalk, the person who got the email shouldn't send it to
the whole
On Sun Mar 21, 2004 at 10:48:19AM -0600, Jeff Schreiner wrote:
My fully registered and activated copy of Office Professional Enterprise
2003 was given to me free by M$all I had to do was register for their
Office System 2003 event...had to listen to a M$ rep ramble for 8 hours
about the
My fully registered and activated copy of Office
Professional Enterprise
2003 was given to me free by M$all I had to do was
register for their
Office System 2003 event...had to listen to a M$ rep ramble
for 8 hours
about the Office System but hey I figure I can give them 8
*plonk*
:0:
# Luz3rz L1zt
* ^From:.*( _snip_ |gadi|[EMAIL PROTECTED]| _snip_ )
Luz3rz_L1zt
- John
--
Mad cow? You'd be mad too, if someone was trying to eat you.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
Alerta Redsegura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following is an excerpt from a PivX statement which is worth quoting:
---
PivX Predictions Confirmed, Qwik-Fix Protected
Over the course of the last 2 years, PivX Solutions has warned the security
industry and the public about the possibility
What have I wrought?
- Original Message -
From: David Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 7:45 PM
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] NEVER open attachments
My fully registered and activated copy of Office
Professional Enterprise
2003
Hi,
Question 1:
---
I have a Banner with Power Server which is it will displayed after opened
the telnet session. Meaning previously it will displayed SunOS 5.6, now it
will displayed Power Server. So how would i get the part of the Banner to be
displayed in BOLD?
e.g. : I want the
You shouldn't take them seriously PivX is full of crap, allways has been
allways will be
One thing you've got to understand about them is that they are a media
company, their busnessmodel is build around getting as many media as
possible to portrait them as experts. And they're doing a damn fine
Nick FitzGerald wrote:
free publicity that will be generated from its entirely bogus claims
being picked up and repeated more or less verbatim by a media machine
now much more focussed on entertaining than on informing and whose
recent history suggests the concept of fact checking is now such a
Vendor : NetSupport
URL : http://www.netsupport-inc.com/
Version : Invision NetSupport School Pro
Risk: Password protection weakness
Description: NetSupport School, market leading training tool for the modern
classroom featuring full student remote control, application internet
###
Luigi Auriemma
Application: - Etherlords I
http://www.etherlords.com/etherlords1/
- Etherlords II
http://www.etherlords.com
Versions:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
__
SCO Security Advisory
Subject:OpenLinux: mutt remote buffer overflow
Advisory number:CSSA-2004-013.0
Issue date:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
__
SCO Security Advisory
Subject:OpenLinux: mc Updated packages resolve local buffer overflow
vulnerability
Advisory number:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
SGI Security Advisory
Title : SGI Advanced Linux Environment security update #15
Number: 20040303-01-U
Date : March 25, 2004
Reference :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
SGI Security Advisory
Title : SGI Advanced Linux Environment security update #16
Number: 20040304-01-U
Date : March 25, 2004
Reference :
Vendor : NetSupport
URL : http://www.netsupport-inc.com/
Version : Invision NetSupport School Pro
Risk: Password protection weakness
Description: NetSupport School, market leading training tool for the modern
classroom featuring full student remote control, application internet
47 matches
Mail list logo
