On 12 May 2004 at 7:27, Tyler, Grayling wrote:
Geqqam69200,
I've seen a few people refer to the lower 6 channels of wireless
as operating in the Ham freq. spectrum. I am a bit confused
where this is coming from as 802.11b operates in the ISM
(Industrial Scientific and Medical) band. This
On 22 Feb 2004 at 15:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
N http://tonioj.multimania.com/win2000src.htm
N Here is the WHOLE windows 2000 source code, with tree,
comments and N everything you will need to find some exploits.
N Updated daily with all the new exploits found.
Unfortunately, all
I see that in a recent article published by eWeek claim legal
experts say individuals examining the leaked Windows code could
face charges of trade-secret violations and infringement of
software patents.
http://www.eweek.com/print_article/0,3048,a=119396,00.asp
Could Microsoft's attorneys go
On 18 Feb 2004 at 13:06, Blue Boar wrote:
Bernie, CTA wrote:
Could Microsoft's attorneys go after sleuths who are, have been
disclosing vulnerabilities in Microsoft's software and allege
that the individual had discovered the vulnerability because
they downloaded the code and examined
On 13 Feb 2004 at 7:32, Edward W. Ray wrote:
Does it not appear that the leak could have been done to ensure
that M$ has a legal argument to abate liability in case they are
sued?
I think their EULA which you accept when installing covers their
ass for just about anything.
This may be true
On 13 Feb 2004 at 14:53, Georgi Guninski wrote:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,5264,00.asp
Allchin: Disclosure May Endanger U.S.
By Caron Carlson
May 13, 2002
A senior Microsoft Corp. executive told a federal court last week
that sharing information with competitors could damage
On 12 Feb 2004 at 18:49, Thor Larholm wrote:
There has been discussions on this mailing list as well as others
about a possible leak of Windows 2000 and Windows NT 4 source
code.
Microsoft has now confirmed these rumours to be true.
http://www.komotv.com/stories/29778.htm
Does it not
On 5 Feb 2004 at 9:29, Eric Scher wrote:
=
=
~ One of our customers asked us for a machine that would
ensure their local network security. Our commercial
representative came and asked if I had a solution for them.
nslookup say:
NS1.HOMEPC.ORG is authoritative for
sans.org and incidents.org
Server: NS1.HOMEPC.ORG
Address:66.129.1.102#53
Name: www.sans.org
Address: 65.173.218.106
and
Server: NS1.HOMEPC.ORG
Address:66.129.1.102#53
www.incidents.org canonical name =
Right on target Michael, and exactly the point most of us in
this and related threads have pivoted from. The Blackout was the
result of poor or nonexistent system security engineering,
implementation, and auditing.
We may be able to accept that the initial trigger incident that
caused the
Back in the 1998 the warnings were out there but no one wanted
to hear it. I tried to get people to listen and there reply was
we have security guards with guns to take care of security.
Now to be fair to SCADA and the Power Plants, there are other
similar instrumentation monitoring solutions,
Over a year ago the NIPC put out a warning about threats
regarding the SCADA Systems
Again, my point is regardless of what caused the Blackout,
attention needs to be given on improving and integrating System
Security first, and replacing the so called worn out Grid
(cables and related
On 16 Aug 2003 at 5:36, Stephen Clowater wrote:
Its highly unlikely that msblast had anything to do with the
power outage. For one, the internal rpc network that is used to
monitor actual power spikes, and to move current from one circut
to the next in a grid is a closed network. And in the
/US/ap20030816_755.html
http://junior.apk.net/~jnoga/F16CAUSE.html
http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20030816/
NEWS08/10 8160106
Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bernie, CTA Sent: Saturday
On 16 Aug 2003 at 20:37, Stephen Clowater wrote:
First of all, it is unrealistic to assume that the power
plants, distribution nodes and sub stations are still equipped
with 1965 technology. Have you ever visited any of these
facilities? I have.
Thats not what I said, What I said was
I did hear that there was a company that just coincidentally
received a patent on a unique superconductor based arrester
valve the day before the blackout. This valve is designed to
suck down excess power surges and they could cost millions of
dollars.
snip
Â…Intermagnetics to develop surge
On 14 Aug 2003 at 17:15, Andre Ludwig wrote:
It is my general feeling that the power failure could be SCADA
related. If it was an attack or an accident i do not know, nor
do i think the appropriate information will ever be released to
the public. Allot of SCADA systems from my research do
It is ridiculous to accept that a lightning strike could knock
out the grid. There are many redundant fault, limit and Voltage-
Surge Protection safeguards and related instrumentation and
switchgear installed at the distribution centers and along the
Power Grid that would have tripped to
Now I don't think that was such a smart move.
It wouldn't take much to setup a bunch of bogus DNS servers to
answer as windowsupdate.com with a pointer to a new A record,
or better yet, round-robin to an infinite number of FQDN, or IP
addresses. In fact, a new variant placed on compromised
On 15 Aug 2003 at 12:05, Jonathan Rickman wrote:
On Friday 15 August 2003 07:03, B3r3n wrote:
msblast start now on far eastern countries. We have a site in
Auckland and so I'll know soon if our DNS to localhost
protection is valuable.
It is irrelevant now. MS has removed the DNS entries
Does anyone know the email address of the person responsible for
the Security of the information systems of the United States
Bankruptcy Court?
I attempted to write them and bring attention to a simple
security/privacy flaw in their system, which if exploited
enables identity thieves to
This is Childs play... Why not just fry the Flash! That is,
given that most if not all computers use FLASH BIOS these days.
I could visualize that a well crafted puppy (Trojan) (i think 20
to 40 bytes should do the trick) can be sent to the target
machine to erase/program the Flash to zip,
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Anders Reed Mohn wrote:
I appreciate the various replies that I've received.
However,
the fundamental question of what defines encryption, so
far as
SB1386 is concerned, is still unanswered. I've looked
through
other California State Bills and supporting
23 matches
Mail list logo
