On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:04:37 +1200, Stuart Fox (DSL AK) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > How about changing the ".exe" convention? Making a file > > executable by it's "extension" probably causes a lot of > > opportunities for problems, doesn't it? > > > > Also, the magic file names, like "CON" and "AUX" should go away. > > > > No way! Am I the only person who still uses "copy con filename.txt" to > create scripts and such at the command line? Please tell me I'm not? >
I don't use it to create scripts, but I do use it. Frequently use the filehandles on unix boxen, too, for that matter. Who needs a fullscreen editor? ;) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
