> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:20:30 -0500
> From: "iDEFENSE Labs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] iDEFENSE Labs Website Launch
> To: ,
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> iDEFENSE Labs i
>-Original Message-
>From: Morning Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:56 PM
>To: Edge, Ronald D; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Name One Web Site Compromised
>by Download.Ject?
>
>> Legal liability questio
>From the latest issue of:
*
SANS NewsBitesJune 30, 2004 Vol. 6, Num.
26
*
Legal liability question: Has anyone contacted
I find it pretty stunning that now even the mainstream corporate online
IT press is jumping down Microsoft's throat over the vulnerabilities and
problems with the Microsoft IE browser.
I recall last week we had a thread in which one poster was defending
Microsoft, and insisting we were just compla
>-Original Message-
>From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 11:08 AM
>To: Edge, Ronald D
>Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] RE: M$ - so what should they do?
>
>Almost everything you said here is user interface, not core
>Windows and why
>Message: 1
>From: "joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] M$ - so what should they do?
>Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:29:00 -0400
>
>Anything specific?
>
>Obviously this isn't going to happen in the short term and
>even long term your statement doesn't say t
>Message: 11
>From: "morning_wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 22:26:40 -0800
>Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft Security, baby steps ?
>Gimme a break..
>http://go.microsoft.com/?LinkID=422101
>although this could be amusing...
>http://www.microsoft.com
