I do ;-p mutt is the best mail client out there, and you know it!
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
#3. Easy to filter. Nobody uses 40 character text terminals these days.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Cappuccio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21,
This is exactly what happened, and I'm sure there are other worms out
there that are much more silent and much more deadly (in and of themselves and by the
fact that they are so silent). I'd do something that rootkits
boxes and then patches them so the ugly blaster doesn't crash them. :-.
my
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Blaster: will it spread without tftp?
This is a good point. One thing that would help as well is if firewall admins just
blocked all tftp
connections, since it is rarely used. Since TFTP is the backbone of how this worm
spreads, it would get rid
of any spread
What a crock of shit, seriouslyv
* Cutthroat Truth
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
India's teenage computer prodigy Ankit Fadia, Gaurav
Kumar and the international reputed ethical hacker
Morning Wood are the co-founders of the school.
so XSS gods are international reputed ethical hackers?
Don't use windose sounds like a solution to me...
* Justin Shin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi All --
My cousin recently got a nasty RPC/DCOM worm and she cannot use Windows update
because when the RPC is shutdown, SYSTEM automatically initiates a shutdown of the
computer as you are all
I run off of RCN and they have recently blocked all outgoing port 25 traffic unless
someone buys a static IP for another
$20 a month. Although I agree that blocking 25 outgoing is nice, I pay for internet
access, not for access only through
certain ports. Due to the nature of my setup, I was
I got this too, and agree it looks sketchy, pehaps someone got hold of their list and
wants to see what e-mails are still 'alive'? And
what people are prone to click on everything they see.
--gabe
* rajesh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
In spite of all the trust implications in outsourcing e-mail
