Re: [Full-Disclosure] 1 patch for 1 vulnerabiliy for Linux and BSD? gunna try and sell us a bridge now too?

2004-04-14 Thread Jan Lühr
Greetings, Am Mittwoch, 14. April 2004 22:18 schrieb Exibar: > are you kidding me? for years and years all I've heard from *nix people is > how secure the OS is and that there aren't as many patches needed for it > and if a vuln is found a patch is released right away hey, hey. Slow down. Th

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Knocking Microsoft

2004-02-29 Thread Jan Lühr
Greetings,... Am Samstag, 28. Februar 2004 23:40 schrieb martin f krafft: > Thus, your point? There are silly things in Windoze that don't get > fixed for years, doubtful they will ever. If you file a bug due to > such a cause, Debian will have it fixed within days. Not true. Read dev-announce o

Re: FW: [Full-Disclosure] DOS all platforms

2004-01-27 Thread Jan Lühr
Greetings, Am Dienstag, 27. Januar 2004 13:35 schrieb Jos Osborne: > Back just before the millenium my local college lost about 30 or so brand > new computers cos' of a virus that overwrote their flash Bios'es with > random gibberish. Said Bios chips were soldered directly to the motherboard > so

Re: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] 3 new MS patches next week... but none fix

2004-01-10 Thread Jan Lühr
Greetings, Am Samstag, 10. Januar 2004 18:35 schrieb Tim: > > It's not that Microsoft doesn't have a clue, they do. We are getting > > regular patches for holes that are found are we not? If they didn't have > > a clue, we would have yearly patches or none at all. Ok, there may be > > some ho