RE: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft updates documentation on Windows time synchronization

2004-08-24 Thread Nicolas villatte
Cisco routers support only MD5 authentication for NTP (http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/hardcisco/chapter/ch10.html). I have found documentation to update ntp clients on unix systems using this MD5 authentication but not the equivalent for Windows 2000/2003 ntp client. Does someone knows if it is fe

RE: [Full-Disclosure] 0xdefaced[6]

2004-08-02 Thread Nicolas villatte
Not anymore :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phuong Nguyen Sent: lundi 2 août 2004 7:17 To: Random Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] 0xdefaced[6] Hello guys, It's now available at http://www.ecqurity.com/defaced6e.zip

RE : [Full-Disclosure] DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c)

2003-07-27 Thread Nicolas Villatte
Chris, It is an old debate between full / partial / non-discolsure. Everybody has its own point. Personally I prefer to know there is an exploit and to have it to quickly test/patch (not all patches fixes all exploits). Public exploit will always be better than private exploit in my opinion. You ca

RE : RE : RE : [Full-Disclosure] [Secure Network Operations, Inc.]FullDisclosure != Exploit Release

2003-01-29 Thread Nicolas Villatte
for everybody not to lose time coding the exploit themselves and test systems against it. Best regards, Nicolas. -Message d'origine- De : Strategic Reconnaissance Team [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : mercredi 29 janvier 2003 2:03 À : Nicolas Villatte Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet

RE : [Full-Disclosure] [Secure Network Operations, Inc.] Full Disclosure != Exploit Release

2003-01-28 Thread Nicolas Villatte
I am sorry but people who made this virus does not appear as script kiddies to me. Do you prefer to be aware of the exploit like the ones that will use it after some modifications or do you prefer only some "elite" is able to harm the systems? Personally, I prefer to die seeing my enemy than being