I had forgotten about the Sarbanes Oxley Act, however
there are two things I think invalidate it under these
circumstances.
S.O. was made to prevent Enron-type fraud in
companies. I'm pretty sure it says that corporations
have to keep *business* to *business* and
*inter-office* messages intact fo
This is from an earlier e-mail I drafted but did not
send:
"ah hah, I made another mistake. I meant Etaoin
instead of Atte in my last e-mail. Thank you Etaoin,
I'm VERY glad to here that you know people who do or
who have worked there. That's very comforting.
Anyone else got anything?"
and aga
Thank you Valdis, you were spot on. I'm sorry, I must
have been misunderstood, my main concern IS a blunt
legal object being used against hushmail to find my
identity. Without contact with their staff there is
no way to prove their claim that their log files do
not correlate IP addresses to e-mai
I was asking for anyone with evidence or experience
dealing with hushmail. You seem to have neither.
Can anyone verify hushmail's claims or provide some
recounting of events that would seem to bolster their
claims?
Thank you.
--- Andrew Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To me this suggests t
I'm interested in finding if there is any truth behind
these claims at hushmail.com. Can anyone tell of
their experiences with hushmail or give them a review?
Does anyone know of a different service that claims
not to log IPs?
>From the Hushmail Technical FAQ:
Is there any way the recipient of a
