Joe User wrote:
Now what are the top 15 security scanners that admin's use?
Top 75 Security Tools (included are scanners)
http://www.insecure.org/tools.html
But I digress... you can get them all on a bootable Linux-based CD
http://www.networksecuritytoolkit.org/nst/index.html
Sweet : )
Rick Up
Exibar wrote:
You might have a point there with your box Curt ;-)
But, Windows has a nice little utility that will patch you system for you
and pop up a nice little box near the clock that says system patched too...
Windows Update works quite well actually. Now if it was only turned full on
by
Alerta Redsegura wrote:
>>Please tell me "what version of PHPnuke is secure ?"
>
>
> Is there *any* secure version of PHPnuke?
Nope and PostNuke is not much better...
http://www.xaraya.com/
is the end result of people getting tired of PHP-Nuke and PostNuke
Rainer Gerhards wrote:
>I wonder if someone else is sharing this experience?
Yes. I quit reading bugtraq because I have a better chance of reading
it on MSNBC first in most cases
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsy
Bergeron, Jared wrote:
>In our testing we found that Virusscan 7 caught this, however
Virusscan 4.5x with the latest DAT did not.
In our testing we discovered that McAffee caught it, but the user was
prompted to respond with some action. By the time one had read the
warning text, the .exe ha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi,
>I found a bug in IE6 ón Windows XP with all Service Packs and Patches
installed:
Freezes IE 6.0.2800.1106 on Win2k SP3 with only 26 Critical Updates
needing to be installed and 10 Windows 200 things at windowsupdate.com
___
Roy S. Rapoport wrote:
>You're a little behind the curve -- blocking outbound port 25 is
>becoming more and more standard, especially with some of the larger ISPs
>(e.g. earthlink) as a spam-blocking measure.
I think you meant so say: "as a futile attempt at a spam-blocking
measure".
__
Johannes Ullrich wrote:
>Well, blocking port 1026 is probably not such a great idea. But
>why would a non-windows user suffer if port 135-139 & 445 is blocked?
For example smoothwall firewalls (Linux) require https on 445 but that
is not the point. The point is I don't want my ISP to start block
Len Rose wrote:
>I've created a poll to address this "Morning Wood" issue.
>Quite a few people have been contacting us in regards to
>his behavior on the list and needless to say no small
>number of people have left the list because of recent activity.
His behaviour is not an issue, unless we choo
- Original Message -
From: "Len Rose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:48 AM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Symantec detected Slammer worm
"hours" before]
> Wow, Symantec is making an amazing claim. They were able to detect
>
- Original Message -
From: "Georgi Guninski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Thor Larholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Epic Games threatens to sue security
researchers
> I am not aware of such industry standar
- Original Message -
From: "ATD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 6:20 PM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] AOL refuses to help AIM users
AOL does not care about AOL's paying customers. What makes you think t
- Original Message -
From: "Richard M. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:24 PM
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] [Secure Network Operations, Inc.] Full
Disclosure != Exploit Release
> >>> One problem with anyone making private exploits is t
> This seems to be equivalent to saying the policemen are the cause of
> evil in our society. If everyone was a law-abiding citizen, they
> would be out of business, so they actually encourage crime.
3 words: "war on drugs"
___
Full-Disclosure - We bel
gdoing. As
of right now, I haven't reported it anywhere but here.
Any thoughts? I mean If I am wrong, I don't want to publish lible about, or
spread slander about anyone.
Rick Updegrove
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> - Original Message -
> From: "Brian Hatch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Richard M. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 5:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] UN support for "security by obscurity"
>
>
> In the computer world we say relyin
- Original Message -
From: "Muhammad Faisal Rauf Danka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:49 PM
Subject: XSS in Postnuke Rogue release (0.72)
> On postnukes own website this issue is handled very
> e
17 matches
Mail list logo
