-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Check it here -> http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~smb/papers/fnat.pdf
This should help clarify why NAT can not be considered a security
feature.
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:12:19 -0800 Kristian Hermansen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have Googled around and
So should we propose an amendment to the US amendment? Maybe something
like
"Freedom of speech. As long you say what we want hear."
Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get
secure FREE email: http://www.hushmail.com/?l=2
Free, ultra-private instant messaging with Hush
you mean something like clicking on the "Cached" linked next to the URL
in your google search results?
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 06:37:55 -0700 "Geo." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I believe it was on this list that someone once mentioned a way to
>use
>either google or yahoo as a proxy server by typing i
- = Dude...Your mom lied your NOT special ! = -
Go join another list which is moderated and protects your from yourself.
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:06:04 -0800 Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>| based on this snippet, your previous posts are bu
First off review the Institutes Privacy Policy I'm sure you have one.
Then ask "Higher" management why they are password protecting a zip file
(worthless secure).
Finally make a recommendation to speak with the vendor who is getting
the data and ask what secure methods of transport they support
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:38:02 -0800 VeNoMouS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>any one know if theres a new exploit for apache 1.3.29 in the wild
>one of my mates boxes was breached this morning by ir4dex appears
>they gained axx via apache then got root via mmap()
Only one I have seen is for "Apache f
Curt,
Please tell me that your kidding about your comment:
"An alternative is to allow only a proprietary extension
through, like .inc Legitimate senders would rename
the file, be it .exe .doc .jpg, indicate in the body
of the message what the true extension is,
and the receiver merely renames
I for one am very grateful for the fact that eEye releases technical
information on the flaw. I think it helps us ALL to know the technical
information so WE as security and IT professionals have a better idea
of what the real risk is.
I'm sorry but Microsoft Knowledge Base KB828028 tells me noth
I think what your looking for is: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer
V1.2 which can be found at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/Tools/MBSAhome.asp
==
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:20:01 -0800 "Geo." <[EMAIL PROTECTED
So if the point of PFW Awareness Day, is to make the average "Joe" or
"Jane" more IT security aware.would we as memebers of the IT security
community not do more good to have a "Complete Disclosure Day" instead
of a mis-leading, tease, buy-my-product day ???
If your true intentions are to show
Scratch the Union idea! I say you look toward a Professional Secret Society...I
hear they were all the rage in past power-player days :)
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:31:03 -0800 Daniel Sichel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> It's time we as a professional group start talking and walking
>like
>> adults (a
Confimed - Segmentation Fault
OS = Slackware 9.1.0
Kernel = 2.4.22
GCC = 3.2.3
int main(void)
{
printf("%c","msux"[0xcafebabe]);
}
$ gcc gcc-crash.c
$ ./a.out
Segmentation fault
Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get
FREE encrypted email: https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2
F
12 matches
Mail list logo
