for the client and community? Or do you just want
to profit off of their problems while believing you are helping?
It smacks of like letting a recovering Alcoholic keep beer in his/her
house, but with some $3000 filter on the lid to only provide H20 when
drank? AA would be cheaper and more effective.
--
dk
thrive with diversity. I welcome a future where
many browsers, servers, programs, os's (etc) are used by the internet
populace... If merely for an aesthetic reason, mono-culture is rice cake
drab.
:)
--
dk
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter
. The application code will not be
executed.
Just because one peculiar desktop OS for PC's (MS' variety) chooses this
action does not indicate that others do; especially where embedded
systems are concerned.
There are many ways it can be done.
--
dk
___
Full
that opportunity to a community that I
can become familiar with to make and informed decision.
--
dk
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
dk wrote:
Indeed, crypto, sans re viewable source, is questionable if for no other
reason. Am I (or you) personally capable of reviewing all that source?
Maybe, maybe not. But it offers that opportunity to a community that I
can become familiar with to make and informed decision.
Forgot
Jianqiang Xin wrote:
It seems that Amazon.com is down. Is it related to any attack?
FYI, to remove local routing or DNS issues you should really check
things like this (via IP) from 2 geo-locations before mailing, then
post the relevant trace-routes, etc.
--
dk
not take responsibility for
their actions outside of the limited issues they directly identify with;
whether that be application coder or bug hunter. :(
--
dk
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure
Willem Koenings wrote:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 02:40:25 -0600 (CST), Ron DuFresne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd disagree in that the tools are getting to be well enough defined that
we are all targets. Best game is to restrict who has access to the ports
being served whenever possible, openssh has a
though Dan. Right off hand I can see errors
that were also in the code posted to bugtraq on the 20th; K-OTik may
have added more, dunno.
--
dk
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
stunts may very well outweigh this one..
Well put. Excellent point (verisign).
--
dk
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
at
hand. :)
http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=130908cid=10928977
--
dk
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Andrew Smith wrote:
This seems to have annoyed quite a few people, makelovenotspam.com is
randomly responding to GETs.
How long untill someone gets a domain in their list and points it at
the lycos servers?
Yes, the site in question seems to have drawn more than a few eyes to
it. ;/ It's been up
Kyle Maxwell wrote:
Also etherape.
Just to round the 'eth*' out.
ettercap
--
dk
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
such, no? ;)
--
dk
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Robert Marquardt wrote:
IBM court case, where SCO claimed certain rights over *periferic*
parts of the
A Hungarian record label contributed to the Linux Kernel? awesome...
:D
--
dk
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http
james edwards wrote:
It is not IRC that is the problem, it is the people on IRC that cause
problems.
Guns don't kill people all by by themselves; people kill people.
but it's the holes they make that really do 'em in, no? %-)
--
dk
___
Full
resistance. If not IRC another venue would be used.
--
dk
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
, especially for a diverse nation of former
immigrants like the U.S.
Hell who knows... this is all OT anyway.
--
dk
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Aside from all the (TM) issues with Mozilla I was wondering if anyone
has scrutinized these builds from Moox?
http://www.moox.ws/tech/mozilla/
--
dk
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
he's done /other/ than binary files -- it just smelled a bit funny.
Or maybe I'm just a super paranoid security professional.
Nothing wrong with that now is there? :)
[1] http://www.moox.ws/forum/viewtopic.php?t=29
--
dk
___
Full-Disclosure - We
on and quick acting like a fscking troll already.
You obviously have some skill. Use it to evangelize your belief's
instead of your droning words, they're only interesting to yourself.
shit.. I just fed you didn't I? Damn me.
--
dk
___
Full-Disclosure - We
mark wrote:
I found the fix for it.
http://tinyurl.com/37p35
Failing that, there is always the old trusty:
http://www.fiftythree.org/etherkiller/
Which, like yours, is a holistic solution..
--
dk
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http
of the
cubicle and turn off the fluorescent lights. Go check out your
reflection in a pond, go for a walk, stare at some fish Bart.
--
dk
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Harlan Carvey wrote:
While I think you have a point I also think Ethan has one too. It
is important to remember that users are generally clueless and/or
unconcerned with security. Of course I'm grossly generalizing but I
think you get my point.
Yes, I can agree with that...I do get the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi people
i'm looking for a very simple,reliable, small (certainly less the 1mb),
must-have gui, windows, stenographic encryption program. i'd appreciate
any recommendations.
thanks
xlop
If your gonna go to the trouble of using steg, do it right. Drop the GUI, get
a
25 matches
Mail list logo
