-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
oh, i forgot:
> On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:17:43 +0100, _evil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> i've had a similiar issue with a 3dfx "banshee" videocard and some
>>(beta)driver under win2k (or win98?). this card had 16MB video-ram
- -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeffrey Denton wrote:
>
> Sometimes you have to have to use a sniffer. Grabbed with lynx and
> ethereal:
>>
oh, yes. i forgot about sniffing for a while.
thanks for the hint,
christian.
- --
BOFH excuse #69:
knot in cables caused data stream to bec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
GuidoZ schrieb:
> I agree - the default cookie manager leaves much to be desired. I've
> found a very useful extension called "CookieCuller" that handles them
[...]
>
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:10:33 -0500, Micheal Espinola Jr
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
don't know if this is the right place to ask, but here it goes:
i was notified by one of my users (!) about the recent samba vulnerability
(CAN-2004-0930 [1]) that this is indeed easily "exploitable" by just
issuing commands with long wildcard-pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Hi
>
> I was hoping someone could kinda help me.. I have some reporting from our
> firewall that produces the following output. I have to analyze this traffic
> but i have to confess that i can not make out if this traffi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernhard Kuemel schrieb:
> Hi full-disclosure!
>
> ntpd 1:4.2.0a-11 (as in debian testing/sarge and unstable/sid) segfaults
> when accessing ntp servers on IPv6 hosts. I don't know whether this bug
you forgot to Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] who is the maint
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cedric Blancher wrote:
> There was a time when arj archiver was not available under Debian, for
> licensing/distribution problems, and only unarj package was available.
> As you can see, stable has only unarj 2.43 in non-free section :
ah! i *thought*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Umphress wrote:
>>...somehow i don't expect programs to mess with /usr. not as a user and
>>not as root.
>
> I just picked /usr, it could have been /etc, /var or any other
> standard directory that every *nix distribution has. Regardless, if I
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:29:40 -0700 evilninja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ unarj x test.arj
>>ARJ32 v 3.10, Copyright (c) 1998-2004, ARJ Software Russia. [27
>>Jun 2004
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Umphress wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test$ unarj x test.arj
> UNARJ (Demo version) 2.30 Copyright (c) 1991 Robert K Jung
>
> Processing archive: test.arj
> Archive date : 2012-11-10 27:44:04
> Can't open ../../usr/local/bin/tes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
kf_lists wrote:
> I really could not find a use for this... can anyone else?
>
> rename it to .html and double click it. You must have msoffice installed
> I believe. -KF
whatever the JS code in your attachement does - at least it crashes my
Mozilla T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Besenbruch wrote:
> This was fixed by the July 27 builds in both Firefox 0.9.2( or 1) and
> Mozilla 1.7. The Mozilla 1.4 branch was also updated.
i was not able to reproduce it in "Gecko/20040719 Firefox/0.9.1" either.
all i get is the real http
bipin gautam wrote:
Hello everybody,
I wounder how many Antivirus/Trojan/Spyware scanners
will choak to death while having a manual scan of
the
file:
http://www.geocities.com/visitbipin/SERVER_dwn.zip
I was woundering, what would be the results if such
file gets stucked in an "AV gateway" (O;
pleas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marcin Owsiany schrieb:
| What does "to pentest" mean? I tried 4 dictionaries, without success.
| Is it the same as "to test on paper"?
penetration testing, as in http://www.penetration-testing.com/
(just found it with google...)
- --
BOFH excuse #172:
14 matches
Mail list logo
